Search results

  1. M

    Do constructs follow the "Damage to Objects" rules?

    Re: Yeah, I think it's high time someone mentioned Hitler... Ahhhhhhhhh, trying to get us shut down, eh? Nazi!
  2. M

    Do constructs follow the "Damage to Objects" rules?

    Re: Re: Re: Do constructs follow the "Damage to Objects" rules? *SIGH* No, taste! TASTE! GEEZ, you'd think people would get it right....... *chomp chomp*
  3. M

    Good feats for reach weapons

    :mad: Grrrr.............must............b**ch.......slap.......
  4. M

    Homebrewers, where do you borrow from?

    I know this is a bit tangential to the question, but: I borrow from here: http://wordsmith.org/awad/index.html I subscribe to the word-a-day list. I'm making a homebrew now, and many of the words on the list are helpful in creating names. I got the idea when I saw the word "numen" cross my...
  5. M

    Beholder's combat

    It's not logic vs. lack of logic. It's an interprative difference. There *is* a clear use for the definition of "3 eyes per arc" even if the beholder can re-orient itself. If it re-orients, then it's still limited to 3 eyes per arc, just in different directions. For example, if it turns face...
  6. M

    Beholder's combat

    Yeah, that's what I mean. "Up" is relative to what way it's oriented. I suppose you're saying that since the SRD uses absolute directions, it's implying that the beholder can't tilt and use relative directions. Fair enough. Given the text in the MM description about vertical lairs, and the...
  7. M

    Beholder's combat

    Erm, yeah. "Other than up." So if it's cut and dried, it's *supporting* the argument that they can bring all 10 to bear in that direction. As to whether or not it can tilt, well.....they're CR 13. They build massive lairs "focused on the vertical". They have a continuous feather fall effect...
Top