Search results

Err... yes. There is nothing inherent in being Invisible about it disappearing when you attack. If an invisibility effect is ended on an attack, the specific effect will state so. However, being invisible does not automatically mean you are hidden. Check out the retooled stealth mechanics in...

The fact that you can't or the fact that you don't have to?

I absolutely love this idea. Separating magic items, gold, and rituals/alchemy is a worthwhile endeavor. Sadly, I probably won't be able to play with it any time soon... But I'm definitely filing this away.

The Wizards' Errata forum is a good place to start for a list of potentially broken stuff.

I think when it says "minor action" it actually means "not a significantly hard thing to do". Though it might have been as attaching a component takes 5 minutes and removing an attached component is a minor action. That seems like it would be the most logical (or robot-awesome).

He wouldn't because the Double Sword is broken slightly overpowered.

And what makes the requirement for a Paladin to be a "front line defender"? Divine Challenge is ranged. They use holy symbols (usually at range). They are proficient with Simple Ranged weapons. Some people like to used Ranged attacks, therefore there are some ranged attacks.

Very nice. I'll have to use this for my next char. sheet to try it out. The only area I really see any problems with is the Equipment section. It just doesn't seem like there's a lot of room for misc./consumable items. However, I don't see a lot to be done about it... The easiest would be...

I'm definitely going to have to bring this to my group if we decide to play some 4e this fall. One thing I'm utterly failing to 'get' is... why would you ever want to recharge an at-will power? I'm sure the answer is in there, but it's a lot to assimilate at once. Edit: Oh, recharge here...

Absolute Literal view: No. You are still attacking with a one-handed weapon, even if you are using it with two-hands. (Current RAW supported by Wizards, AFAIK) More Lenient view: Sure, why not?

Went ahead and updated it with the information above. I still think it wasn't bad for a whole 60 seconds of Excel work. :p

http://www.enworld.org/forum/4826534-post3.html This? Edit: That's not quite it... Hmm... Edit 2:Yay boredom! Organic column is taken from previous links last column. Level Normal Organic (Party of 5) 1 100 100 2 1920 752 3 2560 1824 4 3200 3344 5 4480 5440 6 6400 8240 7 9600 12000...

Does that count as Ninja-Errata? Nice find, Hjorimir.

Nope, you're not missing anything. They "stack".

Personally, ever since I've slaughtered a Dragon, a little pansy snake or badger never seemed too dangerous...

If you want DPR, I think one of the better options is a Tempest Fighter with a Double Sword (AV). At least, that's what people were hailing as "OMG Broken" when Martial Power came out.

If ignore vulnerability, wouldn't you also ignore resistances? Though you have a point on the stacking part... forgot about that. :erm:

Yes. Otherwise, what would be the point of typed ongoing damage? ;)

Nope. You're hosed. Now, maybe if you talk to your DM and explain the situation...

RAW, most likely. My RAI, the attack is an Opportunity Action, which is close enough to an Opportunity Attack, therefore Forced Movement doesn't provoke these attacks. Yeah, it's a bit of a stretch... ;)