Search results

I posted this elsewhere, but Im seeking multiple sources of feed back so Ill toss this here as well. My players are in the process of getting a custom built carriage for themselves. One of them is playing a spoiled noble type char and he insists in needed for the group. Everyone seems to think...

No problem, I'm done.

Here, hows this work. Their value judgment (withholding the overview to not spoil it for players which you are claiming) hinders my ability to run the AP. Therefore the value judgments cannot produce the results of me properly running the AP. Id also like to point out at NO point have you...

And your arguments consist of "you have no argument, you are wrong." Once again, Ive gone over why I consider the reason for not wanting to spoil the AP to be not valid. Perhaps if you've read the thread like you claim you'd find it. Ive given my reasons, as such my opinion is valid. Its not my...

WE haven't established this, you have. You say not wanting to spoil is a valid reason to withhold, and as such its ok that they are not releasing the synopsis, and that our objections are invalid. I do NOT think that is a valid reason, and as such i think my objections are perfectly valid. You...

Yes, because I said my opinion was the end all didn't I? Of course the world doesn't revolve around me. Nor does it revolve around you. This works both ways. Just because you offer reasons why they are might be withholding this information, doesn't delegitimize the complaints a lot of other DMs...

And its not my fault you don't listen to your own advice. I did read the thread and I did read all those points. And as I said, none of those satisfactorily gives enough reason to your argument, IN MY OPINION. And as I said before, I agree to disagree. Perhaps you should as well. Im going to...

No, it hasn't actualy. At least not with any satisfaction for me. You merely state That tells me NOTHING. You give no justification to your reasoning, you just say its correct, and as such the other argument is wrong. And Im not bringing it up because its a revolutionary point, but because...

Once again, you are missing the point entirely. This analogy is simply not valid! Its not PLAYERS who need the overview, its the DMs. In your example of the star wars movies, the players would be the viewers. In which case, yes, your example would be a valid one. However, most of us making our...

Yup. That is a very valid point. It is probably why they aren't releasing the synopsis; they just dont have it all ready or they want some wiggle room in case something changes along the way. I just wish, however, that they would tell us that if it were the case! I think most people would be...

I got mine today! Only cost me 9.95 a month mmhmm mmhmm! edit: Before this gets misconstrued, this is merely a joke. There is no maliciousness behind this. Just attempting to take some of the edge off this discussion :)

Looks as though the Barbarian might not be making it into this month's Dragon afterall. While the overall issue description still mentions the article as being in the issue, the TOC has been updated and no longer shows the Playtest article in it. Not ready for the public, conspiracy to wait to...

Except the AP synopsis does not need to go into such details to provide what we are asking about! We dont need to know that BBEG is some new monster from MM2, merely that he EXISTS, and whats hes going to do. We dont need to know what yet-to-be-released class he is, just that he might have...

The issue is we are trying to HELP them and tell them what this AP needs in order to be better. And they turn around and tell us no, not going to happen. I think thats a pretty significant issue, and apparently I'm not the only one. Yes, they are new at the whole AP thing, but they have to have...

This post here! I think James hits the nail on the head here, and this is coming from a man, as he says, with experience writing these. Hopefully someone from WoTC takes note :) For what its worth, I really like how Paizo decided to toss the overview in the back of the first module of the AP...

This is missing the point. If you are watching the movie, yes it will make a difference. However the DM isnt a "viewer" in this case, they would be the director. Randy is telling the directors they dont need to see the script of the movie, because it would ruin the surprise. You just go ahead...

That answer is just down right insulting, if you ask me. They are basically telling us they know better than us how to run the story. This answer right really, really turns me off to the whole DDI thing now. Ive been behind them for the most part, but if this is the attitude of the staff behind...

Im pretty sure that's not what they said... Im just saying.

Yes, please WoTC. HI-RES Maps please :) Id like to see SOME sort of confirmation, either for or against it. Just so we know where they stand.

No worries, just glad we've got this cleared up. I found your follow up after I had posted my thirdup (is that a real word? Who cares im using it anyway! ) post. And I agree, it is very hard to know where someone is coming from without hearing a voice. It makes me sad that my absolute favorite...