Search results

Calculations Complete... ::yawn:: I'm very tired so forgive me if this is a bit rattled. The 2 bounding works for the Hard Focus rules, this allows the desired results as DbS laid out with impressive things only begining at around level 10 or +14 prowess. Average has been defined as what can be...

Hmmm. Right now I've been bogged down in Soft Focus calculations. Are those "off topic" right now? If so, just say the word. I do have a slight calculation problem that I have just found. Right now I am working on the new gratification table and the soft focus rules. If a couple only goes until...

DbS: Burden, yep that would be a big one. I drop my spell list idea. I do think the DM should have a discressionary flat bonus mod to any soft focus roll though, taking into account spell power and the like. I'm better left on my own with the SF rules for now. Fire away at the clothing issue. I...

Wow. Lots of stuff. ;) DbS: Excellent work. Do you not like the existing clothing rules and want to move to a simpler system? I love the Fret/Fetish system and I look forward to your input and help with HEx. ;) I'm also all for editing the existing network of spells on the site, and I agree...

Doh! Of course Soft Focus comes first! I'll volenteer all my Java skills as I think they will be valubale to the coming discussion. ;) Thanks Sorn, can always count on you to catch the good stuff. :)

Hello all. Wow, some people seem to have been talking. I'm kinda waiting in the wings until DbS finishes all his stuff, then I fully intend to help with preg rules, but my new key focus will be on finaliazing clothing and more importantly SPELLS! Asher, great ideas, however. I must concur with...

Hiya guys. Wow it's been a long week and weekend. :) I have a couple of housekeeping issues I think we should talk about. 1) Lets not post anything else that can get censored. We skirt the edge as it is, so now that we've been slapped by the hand that feeds us, let's be good and play nice. ;)...

Hiya boys! ;) JavaGirl is back with her mountain of calculations. <takes of glasses> :) DbS, the grat numbers do change a little with equal male/female fatigue rules. I'll post the findings here. In the following tables, 0 = Disappointing, 1 = Satisfying, etc... 7 = Raptruous, 8 = BETTER than...

Just a couple of quick thoughts. 1) My program still only gives a male 1 orgasm before fatigue and females get their Con Mod. However, both sexes get CON before exhaustion and 1d6 (5d6 Est) subdual thereafter. Should this be modified? 2) I like the new chart. However, since all the numbers are...

Okay. The Program has been modified for the new fatigue system which changes the numbers dramatically by the way. However, it does fix the problem of higher level characters lasting shorter periods of time. The two fixes were the removal of the Delerious condition and Wis damage fix, AND the...

I now pretty much agree. I still want the fatigue problem looked at and we might have a couple of minor new issues. I have the program run complete. You can look at it at: http://www.geocities.com/vvrayven/vvrayven.htm I fixed a major problem, Ectasy wasn't turned on. <smug look> Oh well...

Welcome, brevdravis. ;) I like your enthusiasim, you remind me of me a little. :) I'll respond to your points: On the Multiple Partners... I don't think you realize how much of an advantage get TWO rolls applied to you is. First of all, there shouldn't be a big bonus to multiple partners. If...

For those of you that are interested, here is a segment of the program run in <detail mode>. ;) Both of the partners are tired (Exhausted, and have already been in engaged for about 45 minutes. Round 46 Male: S(3) O(10) F(2) G(19) Female: S(2) O(22) F(2) G(46) Running Intercourse (Mutual)...

Java Girl is back! <giggle> Okies! Here we go: The Following Three Runs are done with the AI set to stop at ONE male climax: Two Commoners (+0 prowess, 10 Con, level 1) Average Total Time: 19.054118 Average Foreplay Time: 3.12469 Average Intercourse Time: 15.929428...

::yawn:: Mmmm... ::streches:: Wow! DbS, you have been SO busy! ::blows a kiss:: Great work! And so I got to work, as you can see in my following post. On the open issues: 1) I love your rework of my art and the name "Veteran's Knack" Let's go with it! 2) NVI... Alright. I love the category...

Okies. Let me take some time to explain my reasoning. 1) I know we aim to make a good product, but honestly, I don't see big threads poping up over rules-lawyering our GUCK rules. Prowess is by position, and I think throwing all those other things in with penetrative will actually make it more...

I'm against that. I think the listings of positional and oral will make it fairly obvious and intuitive that NVI is the catchall for other stuff. Penetrative should be straight organ to organ sex and nothing else. I stand by this. I think only positions should be listed in it.

Heya boys, sorry if I was a little bithcy last night. ;) I'll try to keep it in check. I agree to change the wording on the multiple partner penalty, but it does need to be stated in both places. I disagree with changing our DC policy. While it doesn't technically matter, in standard d20 the...

Actually, I don't believe their were tech suitability mods in the first one either. And it isn't the mental is secondary. Mental is FAR more powerful than physicsal and as such is much harder to induce. Physical arousal is eaiser and the variety of techs change the way it is used dramatically...

We'll consider this. I want to hear DbS's take on why he removed it first. :) It has always worked like this, silly. ;) Nothing has changed, except now it is a little clearer. There are no mental modifiers, but a good point to list is as a DC modifier. The reason there are no mental...