Search results

And that is the reason I want them in the PHB2. Cause ever since 1E, the cry "But it's not core so we aren't using it!" (not that Olgar used that excuse. Don't know the guy, he coulda just said nah, he don't like it) has been used to no put Psionics in games. Putting it in a core book makes...

By the way, thanks for educating me on the fact that RPGA and Living Greyhawk are not synonymous. I thought some rules (like the level cap) applied across all RPGA games.

Sigh. Again, never said that they were a poor choice. Have multiple times stated they would be a good choice, but that their playtest reporting might be skewed by their experiences (ie: the idea that high level spells broke down game play - while there are broken spells, not all high level...

Actually, I didn't say anything of the sort. What I said was that everything that I have read about the new rules (More rapid advancement, more choices, higher level cap) goes contrary to the rules RPGA applies to itself (measured/slow advancement, restricting choices, lower level cap). With...

I am a current RPGA member. It's not all I play, but one of our DMs likes it so for his campaign (of which we have 3) we are using the RPGA rules. For the most part, every RPGA member I have met or spoken to would make a great playtester. I just have one concern. A large part of the RPGA is...