Search results

15.

paizo.com - Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / Archives / Clark from Necromancer goes Pathfinder In any event, I'd certainly classify Clark as one of (if not the biggest) non-WotC 4e cheerleaders in the time up to and just after...

Personally, I'd call it the GSL.

That's fine, Mr. Pot.

I guess I'm lucky. My players know I'm a great min-maxer and being the DM, I automatically win any arms race. So we sit down and have fun without all the fussin' and a-feudin'.

See above. I do not have unlimited time in a day or week to work on an adventure for my group. If the fancy strikes me to buy a prepared adventure, then one that will require a minimum, if any, amount of conversion gets my interest whereas one that very likely would require a greater amount...

Nor I. Any adapting of 3.0, 3.5, or even Pathfinder stuff for my 3.5 or Pathfinder games have been done on the fly. Pun intended.

*shrug* I find converting for 3e to be pretty easy, generally speaking. The catch, and why your snarkiness only makes you look bad given the reason you espoused, was already mentioned. I know virtually nothing of 4e, so I'd have to learn it first in order to properly translate. That doesn't...

EDIT: stupid forums, timeouts are for kids

Snarky or serious?

I happen to know of great Pathfinder material that I'm missing out on right now. And that's stuff I wouldn't have to bother converting.

Some people should just get a room. And Grump, I know how you feel. When Zeitgeist was announced for 4e exclusively, I never bothered to look at it. With Morrus saying he'd consider Pathfinderizing it, I took a look and it does look neat. Hope it works out. I bought a WotBS sub way back...

I don't dispute the accuracy of your report, Goonalan. Heck, I used to be you, in a manner of speaking. But at the end of the day, you're only one person. Nevermind that you have the buying habit of four. The two biggest mistakes a company can make: 1) Don't listen to their customers. 2)...

Here's the thing. And I select this post to use an example. Let's imagine. Let's imagine that every single person in this thread, from Morrus to me all agreed that WotC needs to improve their 3pp support. How much impact would that have on WotC? Given that WotC has already decided that 3pp...

Wait. Earlier it was argued and pointed out that people are publishing without abiding by that license. Sure, I don't think they're asking for anything in return, but where's the "standard elsewhere in print media" if Kenzer et al aren't paying a penny for licensing nor are they abiding by...

I'd like to think that too and happen to do so. But, what if they felt it was negatively impacting them? What if they felt that they'd lose money for the effort? Would they still be so supportive? Rhetorical question; it's a situation that I doubt even Paizo could answer (unless it's...

They disagree. And honestly, since no one that I've seen post on this has any control over how/what Wizards does, we're basically just wasting disk space on the server. Heh, couldn't hurt. I get the passion. I don't think it's a bad thing from a publisher. I think everyone else who's...

As a player, I agree wholeheartedly - it'd benefit the players and incidently, 3pp. But if I'm Wizards and considering this, my customers are the only ones I'd worry about, again unless I believe 3pp are good for me.

I hear you. But let's say that statement is wrong and for the sake of discussion Wizards is the most incompetent company on the face of the planet. I do quibble with some of what you said (Borders, for example is selling off their inventories at substantial discount to customers instead of...

Again, speaking from a Pathfinder customer and not a 4e one (aside from the core 3 I bought at launch), I feel inclined to point out that not only is the subscriber model one that is a core of Wizards, but I'd also argue that the subscriber model is one of Paizo's core markets as well. Sure...