Search results

The idea of fast spending of hd is an interesting one all it really enables is a bit more stability in a bigger fight. https://www.gmbinder.com/share/-MrUNf61qoDb0Csw8a9r

Maintaining a spell taking concentration and that causing loss of other ability like losing the ability to swiftly react (ie you are focusing why can you cast a shield? or absorb elements? or silvery barbs?) would be an effort to actually make concentration a limit. As it stands its like having...

yeah weak and innadequate intrinsically overshadowed by almost every class in the game because they use spell slots.

Indicated by implication... that this "shouting limbs back on" was a problem I am sure of it LOL.

Apparently a Wizard existing means you cannot have an Eldritch Knight, that is exactly your claim. That a specialist prevents the subclasses which dip into its realm what a load of poppycock. Further In a game with bloody open ended multi-classing like 5e and you worry about this? (two of the...

?Link?

Level 3 is safe that is a huge delay for a caster (ie most classes) .... Add bonus action access to it at some point too. Multiclassing and level dips is not great currently WOTC is fixing some of it - see Action Surge is now pretty martial specific (or maybe gish).

Just battle leader, but yes this does have some potential though it does indeed involve making the fighter class "more". It is also in keeping with the 2e Fighter descriptions which I rather like.

One could expand on the maneuvers in that fashion I suggest a good portion of the battlemaster maneuvers could use a similar expansion.

What are you talking about?..... If you said you wanted to play a wizard and someone said here is a Eldritch knight we removed the Wizard class ... you can just use a staff and make it a dex build.... that ought to be satisfying right?

I called that spending an attack and gaining a superiority die "scanning for openings". I agree it is a good benefit for the battlemaster at root. There is more to the problem than infrequency. The best you do is still sidekick calibur single target benefits. Benefiting the whole team is...

Battlemaster is as much a Warlord as an Eldritch Knight is a Wizard. (not saying it cannot be done but you have to recognize why people find it less than satisfactory given how inflexible the fighter class is currently and how innadequate the maneuvers are)

I seen a swordmage based on the Warlock structure... not too bad. Neither example is a core class a Wizard variant does count though.

Definitely looks like it now.

If one is doing table specific rules Charge and Power Attack (or bonus action attack) may become an across the board standard house rule option (for those trying to bridge the gap) . Feats or Maneuvers... ie class features... every spell is another feature for the spell caster. It is why...

I know horribly old thread has anyone homebrewed the other core classes on the Warlock Chassis? Oh and of course WOTC is breaking this class removing its interesting mechanical distinctions.

Basically a moment that One D&D is designed to encourage.

This... most definitely.

Can you back that up? I mean "most" is vague and in general this is kind of anti-teamwork. All across the board (once per turn activation seems much more sensible)

Fix it with magic items... hmmm wonder why that rarely works.