Search results

Pure win. Seriously, If I had to make a choice between your website layout or Wotc's, I would pick yours in a heartbeat. Nice job :)

I voted 9. would have voted 10 seriously 4e looks like its going to be awesome. I can't wait until June.

4th edition killed my respect for 3.x I can't bring myself to play in any 3rd edition games. I keep thinking about its flaws, like the 5 minute workday, or the horrible monster stat blocks. I'll be in purgatory... call me when 4th edition comes out.

Great suggestions every one. I have one to throw in: The soundtrack from WoW. It makes great instrumental music... Hey, if we are going to borrow the game mechanics we may as well take the music while we are at it. ;) link

Come on guys, be serious. This is 'the' perfect Mood Music for 4th Edition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyx7UJndtlI

I remember watching a video on marketing, and how a company produced 2 different types of mouthwash (at least I'm quite sure it was mouthwash... For the purpose of this example it is). The older mouthwash tasted like fowl, like medicine. The newer mouthwash had a much nicer taste. Both products...

I would download, keeping my books on pre-order. Just throwing my 5 cents in.

Seems overpowered. By quite a bit IMO

nevermind...

Its over 500. I remember seeing that somewhere. Edit: Actually i think that I've mistaken the monster count in the MM for the power count... :\

I think everyone is on the same page here: Basically all dailies are already *reliable* in some way or another. Side note: IMO i think its better to have the power deal half damage rather than being reliable. That way, you don't waste your turn on a miss.

Nice Fallen Seraph. I couldn't have said it better. I think if there has been a shift in paradigm, this is it.

At this stage i couldn't care what 4e was compared to. People could say that its too similar to monopoly and it wouldn't matter. All i know is that i like it

I still don't really understand the difference between the two. And I've seen more posts on the subject than i can shake a stick at. 4e: gamist/abstraction - I find that 4e deals out plenty of immersion. I would go as far as to say that it gives out more. The game is much more...

I wanna try them all. I'll be the main DM, but fortunately everyone in my group gets a chance to put the DM hat on. so I'll get to play in between the gaps. I wanna try them all, but my 1st will probably be: Dwarf Fighter or Warlord or Gnoll ranger. I might also give half-elfs a whirl. I...

Yeah, my last post sounded a bit pigheaded. Now that I've relaxed a bit. Yeah, its defiantly possible to have fun with no battlemat /grid. I do actually play non-grid combats from time to time. It does have its benefits such as being quicker among other things. However, sometimes you need to...

The only thing that would have truly sucked is if they did actually design the game so that it was run without a grid. Of course it will suck without the grid. I don't see how combat could/would be better if they had designed the game to run without a grid.

Depends on the group. The players, the DM, the type of campaign. Basically, just tailor this to your needs. EDIT: also i don't think monsters should have a TQ. It just feels unnecessary to me. Almost like adding extra skills to a monster like Profession(cooking) +7.

I voted for 1-1-1-1. I also like the idea of 1-2-2-2 because its so straightforward and a good alternative to 1-2-1-2. Problem with that is that it makes diagonal movement pitiful. A creature that can move 6 squares forwards can only move 3 squares diagonally.

Well, If you wanted to give the players a sense of danger, you would just throw stronger creatures at them. This whole 'Trauma' business is a bit different. Its giving players negative side effects for taking significant damage. I'm sorta understanding why. Its not making the system more...