Search results

Nevermind.

Nothing new to us, but I thought It'd be nice to have a table that shows it all. (Edit: Temporarily replacing the graphic while I check something in the moderator forum--if we can repost this, we will. --Dinkeldog/Moderator)

Oh noes, I definitely don't want my books 10 days earlier. That's just ... too chaotic for me.

We'll have to see how the rules work. If anyone can enchant an item then I don't think mages need to be special anymore. I like the rule: You can only identify things you normally use or are proficient with.

Surely, you mean the Identify spell?

Ran a 3.5 game last night. Did not give my monsters stat blocks. Took random percentages from players to make sure it wasn't too hard, but still challenging. I shouldn't have to do that, I should be able to pick a monster or make one in a few seconds, depending on how involved I want it. Using...

I entirely enjoy the fact that the systems are becoming easier to design for and better quality. I'm glad that everything is being universalized and better presented. However, I just think that traps are less fun sounding that fight-based encounters. I can't seem to get behind traps, and now...

Happy to oblige. :)

Unless commoners aren't push overs as they shouldn't be. Peasants from old would destroy any of us in one on one combat. They worked so hard they kept in good shape, almost entirely.

Definitely not worth 500 posts... or 200 for that matter.

Hah, jaelis, this wasn't even available at 9:00. It wouldn't show until 9:01. Sneaker.

Hah. I don't see a problem with only allowing one attack a round: You're still wielding two weapons, you just only have time for one swing before the other person decides to attack you back. Right? :P

Well, a blade is a blade I suppose, but then why does a dagger do less damage than a longsword? Little characters have the same amount of hp, I suppose they should do the same amount of damage with their weapons. I've never thought about it.

Not a bad idea, but that might be too powerful. Who knows, I suppose?

I wouldn't be surprised if there is more into weapon size categories they don't want out yet. I can't imagine a smaller person would make a normal sized weapon when they can't use them properly. Simplicity or no, that's just silly.

I like the weapon properties on each weapon. I disliked how 3e weapons were so similar to each other that it just came down to scimitar and rapier because they had better crit ranges. I hope they git rid of that type of thing.

Excerpt: Weapons http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080507a

I like what you've done with my sheet. Very to the point and personalized. :) Thanks for keeping my website on them!

I'm sure we'll have some sort of scroll mechanic for Exploits. Pamphlets that tell you how to kick? :)

This is my point. I don't care if you like 4e or not. I just don't like to see people attacked either way. I mostly see the 4e likers attacked. My post was not an insult, but an observation. I apologize if it sounded insulting. I explicitly said that people don't like change, and stated that...