Search results

The reason why I wanted to avoid Tome was because of the Swordsage: I didn't want to step on anyone's toes. If Warblade differs that much (and I need someone more experienced with it to verify, cause to me it feels like a super fighter) then I could go with that. Duskblade otherwise.

Yea, he really has it out for me. He thinks I am cheesing because I choose class/race combinations that are different. I wanted the Factotum this time though purely cause it could do anything, and in this group, when needed the support character, as was pointed out by someone here. But he...

The race is set: the DM will not allow it to be changed. If I would of known he would of had such an uproar over Factotum, I wouldn't of picked an Air Genasi. Its not my fault that you can bluff in combat to make an opponent flat footed for your next attack and thus spam Iajutsu Focus. .... well...

I was banned from Magic of Incarnum, due to playing an Evil Incarnate and killing the party with a Necrocarnum Zombie. "Air Genasi are fast and free willed", which sounds like, in battle, a hippy. Peace and Mother Earth. Atleast, that's the slant I can take, I don't HAVE to, after all, I'm still...

oh jokes galore lol. To put what I said a different way, a guy that doesn't care to fight, but will fight if need be. We, literally, have a ranger doing pretty much that. So as not to step on anyone's toes, that option is closed to me. The DM doesn't care what kind of druid, the fact that its...

The DM thinks its broke, and since he thinks it is, then it is, regardless of actual facts. What I want to do with the char is play on the Air Genasi tendencies. IE, a hippy of battle. Duskblade is an idea.

Rest of the party is Swordsage, Ninja, Ranger, and was my Factotum. He DID allow the Warmage, since its battle oriented, but for the most part, magic is something he doesn't want players to have complete control over. Clerics are pretty much the "wear robes and bless you", not the "swing a mace...

CR8 as in the swordsage had the HP of it.

Ok, its me again! Anywho, our NEW DM wanted a new campaign, where we are lvl 2, and he wants it to be based on war, battle etc, and to that end is reading up on Heroes of Battle. To go with this, our classes are restricted to being more or less martial/battle inclined. While the other classes...

Man, you guys are just mean. I'm not even playing in that campaign but I can tell people are sterotyping. I played and seen played other classes as pickpockets, including a druid, a wizard, and a paladin, of all things. Just because there's a rogue in the group doesn't mean automatically the...

There's a class similar to the assasin in the I think either complete divine, exalted deeds or complete champion. Best bet at this point is to make the char into that class, give him his 20% exp penalty and be on his way.

I agree with this. Mainly cause the rules of Fascinate doesn't properly apply here. The creature isn't taken any penalties, or anything, it is completely capable of acting on its own. The way fascination works is like a trance, so obviously just about anything under the sun can break it. The...

So what I'm getting is that any spell, regardless of how beneficial, is a threatening act. Speaking in a different language is a threatening act.

I actually want the RAW. Mark of Justice does not initially harm the creature affected, and under most situations, shouldn't do anything at all once the situation was explained. And even then, it doesn't do any actual damage: in this case it just makes the character sick. NOT sickened as in the...

I aim the hilt of your sword at you to give it back to you. I cast cure minor wounds on you. According to what you are saying, both cases the charm will break, which makes little sense. On top of that, the remainder of what you said needs more clarification: remember, the subject is charmed, so...

Its not a SLA, its specifically listed as a SU. Unless I'm mistaken, I was pretty certain that SU doesn't provoke AoO.

1. the target is a rogue. I seriously doubt it can identify spells. 2. The spell COULD be harmful, but it isn't immediate. Its Mark of Justice. 3. The rogue knows its the target, since I told it to sit there while our cleric "helps" it by giving it a magical tattoo that is pretty much invisible...

Oh wait, I get it the confusion. Charming Gaze, is the Su ability of a Half Vampire . Its fuctionally identical to Charm Person, so basically, the question I'm asking is, does casting a spell break Charm Person.

huh?

As thread title. In respect to Charming Gaze.