Search results

Hogwash. Variant made a definitive statement that made it sound like everyone should agree with it as if it is fact. I just made sure to tease out that it was an opinion. Yes, a post by a person should always be considered their single opinion... but people tend to forget that and start stupid...

You forgot to add... "in my opinion" to the end of that statement. ;)

Check this out! Stan Shinn has devised a 1e to 5e monster conversion tool. Looks like he based it on the last playtest packet, but he will be updating the math based on the starter set in the next week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLWm8hX-bg4

Can we not rehash this gods damned conversation again? Please! I believe the topic is about 5e. Stick to it.

No, no, no, no, NO! They would dress like Purple Rain era Prince. It is written in the great big book of religious evildom and tomfoolery. On a more serious note. It's more interesting if they all dressed the same, and you couldn't tell good from evil just by looking at them.

Uh oh... Nerd fight! Hide your rule books, hide your dice!

I agree that it's campaign specific. But I'll also be the first to admit that if the campaign followed the more strict meddling gods model, I would be playing the least religious character that ever graced the universe.

The two page layout looks great. I can see that the book will be very pretty. I stand by my dislike of the super model pose. It just looks completely uncomfortable with her legs splayed out like she's trying to slow down on skis as she barrels down the bunny slope. Add to that the super...

If lovin' you is wrong, I don't wanna be right?

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

D&D... I can't ragequit you! /ragequit

I like both the 4e Tiefling and the 2e Tiefling. So no problem for me on this. The art is OK. I don't have a problem with the visible brush strokes. I do have a problem with the super model pose. That tells me nothing about a character, unless that character is someone that walks the runway...

Traditionally, when I say tradition, I mean the tradition of eschewing tradition. B-)

My 4e DM is moving cross country in a couple weeks. I'll happily play any version of D&D... But without a DM I might have to run a game. Something I haven't done in 30 years. Gulp

I don't think the point is whether it is 100% official or not. The point is that this concept is old... And that people that rely on the "tradition" crutch don't have a leg to stand on. ;)

I based a paper on water pollution on that article. Not the content, of course, but the style. Got an A, and won a writing contest... Also shook the mayor's hand as he handed me a plaque. :)

You can't fire me. I ragequit!

Then there is my old character Sigrid Sildhamar (a commission I had done). It's a shame she died in a TPK. http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/137/0/c/sigrid_sildhamar_color_sketch_by_jebriodo-d503e7o.jpg

So... Is killing evil or good? And if it's evil, how does that synch with the paladin? And if it's good, then how does that synch with the paladin? Is killing lawful? Or chaotic? Or is it neutral?