Search results

What spell are you talking about? I haven't found it yet.

So i guess Shield makes Clerics obsolete and should be nerfed? AoE damage is not the sole reign of wizards, not even control is. All classes meld slightly between defending, controlling, striking, and leading. Wizards gets some striking(mainly AoE striking), rangers get some defending, rogues...

Yes you can shift while prone, you can even get up during that shift iirc.

1. 1/round 2. No clue

You mean, like the wizard? Also, if doing AoE damage is what makes a controller a controller, the Wizard wins hands down. E.G. Bigbys Grasping hands, 4d10+int to two enemies AND it grabs them as a MOVE action per round. Daily Prismatic Beams: 4d6+2x int + 4d10 + control(save ends) + 10+4d10...

A warlord can pick up the inspiring commander ability(or whatever) and whenever anyone spends an action point(I.E. a daily), they heal the warlords level + Cha mod. If he is pumping cha/str like he ought to that will be a sizable amount of hit points. Not quite healing surge level, but enough to...

No, you need to re-read page 56, 62, 131, 157 275 only mentions the exception when discussing bonus stacking as an aside, it is not the reference.

except when the rules define how powers are effected by implements and weapons and when they define what exactly an implement does to a power.

More likely to stop people from enhancing hunters quarry via the paragon path as the ranger multi-class is already on of the stronger options. I know at least one lets you quarry multiple opponents in a single go, and that almost takes the limiter off the "one quarry per encounter" rule...

Not "an attack roll or damage roll you made while using a dagger[in some other manner]" "an attack roll or damage roll you made using a dagger" So yea, it kinda does require you to use the dagger to attack.

You are using a power, the use of the dagger as an implement modifies the power. You are not using a dagger to attack, there is no weapon keyword.

If you're not going to bother reading what I write then there is no reason in attempting to have a conversation. Ill bold the important parts Incorrect. Though this is entirely semantics. Passive abilities are on all the time. Active abilities are ones that are activated. By either a trigger...

Ti-i-i-ime is on my side, yes it is.. Also, level 5 and level 10 respectively. Some, not all. Mask is making the assumption that he will have enough wealth to convert to into all the stuff he wants and extra weapons of the right type. I doubt that.

No, it says "using this symbol to attack with a power". The part that was bolded was not complete as much as it makes your argument better if it was.

"when" "Whenever" These things are not ongoing. They are triggered by an action. These actions require you to be using a power through an implement. You can't use a power through two implements. ("You may use an implement") Only two are triggered by actions not involving using a power...

Its a good thing none of the powers in question actually say that. Now, you will excuse me if i sound rude when i ask you whether or not you can read complete sentences and understand subordinating conjunctives?

Only if the rogue is attacking with the dagger in his off hand, or your DM is unfamiliar with portions of the English language dealing with implicits and doesn't look at errata. And only if the warlock is using is power through the particular rod, since no rods have passive effects. And without...

Thank you for proving my point, read them again, you're attacking with a power, not the implement. You're using the implement with the power. Also: Wielding =/= attacking with

And you kept it in your grab bag of magical items? And how did you get the +3 and +4 bastard swords, buy them both?

That is a lot of item wealth you are dropping into your weapons.