Search results

But it’s not an AP what they are publishing for 5e. It’s only the monster manual of the AP. They’re going to release the anniversary AP only for PF2, or at least that’s what says in the press release.

So you think you can veto what other people discuss? BTW this thread is about PF2 and you have been rambling about stuff which doesn’t have anything to do with what we already know about it, that is actually no so little if you listen to the podcasts about it and read Paizo’s forum.

Do you have statistics to backup that claim? BTW I was making up those numbers to make a point about not any rule been more realistic than no rule, and not to give any approximation to real numbers.

This makes no sense. If weapon breakage happens in reality once in ten millions then a rule of not breaking at all is more accurate and realistic than a rule of 0.01%

Based on the things I’ve read from Paizo’s staff they are aware that they are way smaller than WotC and their business model takes that in consideration. At least that’s what I get from the comments I”ve read.

The playtest PDFs are free from day one. They published the books for the people wanting them, mostly collectors. Also the playtest isn’t the final game at all.

If you know why Pathfinder exists at all then you can assume Paizo’s management should not be very fond of WotC

This makes no sense at all, the failure can be fixable or not depending on the context.

Where in 13th Age’s quoted rules says the situation can be solved in another way? I think you misinterpreted the text.

I think that’s what paizo is trying to do with pf2, but we won’t know if they succeed until it’s published. The play test is NOT pf2. At least they added free re-training as standard downtime rule

RAW 5th edition with mele and 4th in general don’t support this, but you can house rule both very easily. So what’s your point? I don’t get it

landing safely and surviving are not the same

Do you realize that with that definition you’re not changing anything about the discussion. The 4th edition fireball has the same potential of bean lethal as any other edition fireball but adds narrative control to the players on what happens on zero hp. That doesn’t have anything to do with the...

I think you need to improve your reading skills, the paragraph starts with “most”

You can house rule whatever fits your group style, but then we start talking about a customized edition, and that’s an entirely different beast

This reads like a suggestion and not a rule

For example, with a epic level of acrobatics you could fall from kilometers of height and landing safely

I think is a matter of what Aldarc means by "high epic fantasy". If we assume that the premise "hi level entities should be capable of control large quantities of low level entities" to be true for "high epic fantasy" then 5E is not capable of doing that but 3.x/PF1/PF2 are.

The pdf versión of the final pf2 should be about the same price of pf1 pdf. So it should be very affordable

Another D20 derivative that is light and could fit your needs is radiance rpg. And the core rules are free