Search results

I have used Troll & Toad as well. Their prices are a bit high but their selection is pretty gosh-darn good.

Gotcha covered.

Anyone who votes Tiefling should be kicked off these boards. ;)

Four levels minimum. Nobody > Hero (local) > Hero (lord) > Hero (epic) I think my ideal would be something like: Level 1: Nobody Level 2: Hero (local) Level 3: Hero (local) Level 4: Hero (lord) Level 5: Hero (lord) Level 6: Hero (epic)

I'll take you at your word that it wasn't meant toward me or what I was saying. I think it might have helped if you had made clear in your post where your response to me ended and your general statement began. Something like: Hussar to Ghost - Words. ----- Hussar - General Statement. As...

Hussar - If you have questions about what I do or how it works, please, feel free to ask - I will gladly respond. If you want me to clarify anything I say, please ask and I will respond. But if it is your intent to mischaracterize what I write, then consider this discussion with me over.

I'll use an example here from the current campaign I am playing in. It is a D&D 3.5 edition, Forgotten Realms campaign setting game set in the Silver Marches region. The party consist of a Dwarf Ranger/Deepwarden, a Halfling Paladin/Cavalier, a Gnome Wizard/Loremaster, and a Human Spirit...

No, I read that part. I am trying to see where the difference is between what you wrote above and what I wrote below. AFAICT, in both cases the players are having a discussion and that discussion will (most likely) result in some form of compromise. It seems that I am taking it one step further...

What's the difference between "put my foot down" and "tough noogies"? At the end of the day you are still telling one player that they cannot do what they want to do.

Are you suggesting that Dark Sun would have been more popular had it not included Elves, Dwarves, Halflings, etc.? I'm not so sure that that is true.

I generally do not do typical surnames as we know them today; instead I focus on "of [place]", "the [profession]", "the [title]", "son/daughter of [person]", or "House of [name]". For example the party could meet: Edward of Greyhawk Edward the Miller Edward, The Black Prince Edward, Son of...

I actually prefer ENWorld's boards to either WotC or RPGNow precisely because the quality of discussion here is better than over there. Even the threads that are (or descend into) an edition war tend to be more civilized. The moderators here do a great job of keeping the level of bile to a minimum.

Same here. That being said, there is one thing that I have never liked... ...yeah, this.

Fair enough. There just seems to be a lot of donkeys and mules in this thread! ;)

While I am in general agreement with the "just wing it" advice, I got to ask - why is someone wanting a book of Mundane Items so appalling that you need to challenge someone's play-style or refer to them in words that would make Grandma blush?

Hi Rodney! First, I have not been a big fan of WotC Dungeon/Dragon. When it came time to renew my subscription I let it lapse largely because of the quality of the adventures. Second, I have not read this whole thread; only the first page or so. I don’t know if what I am going to say...

My experience differs from yours. All the people I played with built strongholds, towers, monasteries, churches; hired mercenaries and other hirelings; equipped said armies; and then adventured for more! Edit. My character, at the end of our 1e campaign, had two strongholds, a coal mine, an...

I believe the proper term is "Harlot" and I want my table so I know when I am propositioning one whether I am propositioning a Brazen Strumpet, a Haughty Courtesan, or a Saucy Tart. :)

This. 100% this.

So what? The word "guarantee" has six (!) different, acceptable pronunciations according to my dictionary.