Search results

*raises hand* Sorcerer with Ispnosp, a tiny viper familiar (yeah, I am not the most serious of gamers) in Living Greyhawk. 1) Maybe once every few mods, usually for early warning. Most recently, an assassin who used strong rose perfume to cover his scent was giving us problems. Upon entering...

Glad to hear it is going well! I know from experience that such situations can be very touchy. Good Luck!

Nope, no axe, just knew someone would chastise me if I didn't include it. I find it rather unfortunate that everyone wants to keep saying lawful. I considered it obvious, as do most people judging by the answers. They just can't stop mentioning it... Still, better to have comments then not...

Yup, that is part of the paragraph I read before posting. No where do I see anything that states that good people treat evil people the same way they treat good or neutral ones. I also don't see anything that indicates that justice doesn't include execution or vigilante justice. I certainly...

Mind letting us know how it works out?

I feel it is inherently lawful, for reasons others have said far better then I would. I didn't see it as necessary.

To be honest, while this is a perfectly reasonable view of what Good is, I don't think it is justified by the RAW, unless you go by the Book of Exhalted Deeds.

I thought it was to discourage excessive 'dipping', at least for those who aren't human or half-elf.

Sin City.

Okay, go the poll working, please enter your votes. :heh:

The latest 'What Constitutes Evil' (hereafter known as WCE) thread has got me wondering: What alignment best matches the 'An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth' approach to morality?

Depends on how you award XP. Ways to distribute XP that I can think of as follows. Combat XP should not be reduced unless you are especially picky about metagaming in combat or you have a player who actually LOOKS UP the monster they are facing during the fight. Roleplaying XP should only be...

Trying to get a better handle on the situation, so here are some more questions I would ask of LadyGM: You say Player 3 is a self-confessed ass, in game and out. How, exactly? Is he always making snide comments? Does he keep all treasure he finds from the party? From my own point of view...

It's pronounced Kimira, not Shimera, dammit!! ;)

Okay, that helps clear things up a bit. I don't see it as making Player 3 any more reasonable, but it does look like there is a minor problem with the couple. Assuming the both Player 1 and Player 2 are relatively experienced players, I would probably talk to Player 2 about how you see Player...

No, really, how where they cowardly?

I don't know WHAT you are talking about Patryn. I don't see the text you wrote there! It says 'hand', just like is supposed to and always did! :uhoh: ;)

I think you may be confusing Exhalted good (as per the Book of Exhalted Deeds) and regular D&D good. I think you judged harshly for the following reasons: 1. From the sounds of it, they were in no position to turn the survivors over to anyone. As killing them was wrong and letting the guy go...

Thus my request for more information. There really is too little here to go on, and what little there is sounds like bad attitude on the one guy's part. I'd still like to know why it is a good thing that everyone knows they are engaged.