Search results

I agree with Valhalla. It's basically just the learning curve thing. Or put another way, one of the aspects of moving up in level is that abilities get more DIVERSE as well as more powerful. And SR is one of those diverse things. SR is usually pretty balanced at CR + 10.

I don't know, I was just imagining a campaign in which the deity players have to deal with this sniveling little upstart of a kobold psionist as he steadily gains more and more power... I'd limit Pun-Pun to non-godly abilities at first, but then, through the normal means of obtaining...

You know, you could use these rules to create Pun Pun legitamately. I wonder what Pun Pun's CR is -actually- equal to?

I think the wizard's CharOp board covered this one pretty well with this build: Gothina Tina, the Ultimate Quadruple Threat.

Can we at least agree that the rules, as they are written, do not expressly allow INA to be a size category larger?

You can have multiple ioun stones of different types. I don't believe they stack with themselves.

I love having 3769.9111843077518861551720599354 cubic feet of fire to work with.

That is, again, assuming that prerequisites are seperate from the feat somehow. Meh. While I don't consider the FAQ canon at all, I do consider the PHB2 to be canon, and that's more than enough for me. The logic for both sides of the INA debate seems to be open to just enough interpretation...

Ah. Pity, I don't have the Dragon Compendium... eh, people say that the things that come out of the zines tend to be unbalanced anyway.

I'd consider myself a rules literalist, and I agree with the FAQ in this instance. I don't agree with the FAQ on all instances, but in this one I do. For the interests of being specific as to what we're arguing over, please tell me if this interpretation of your argument is correct. I think...

What books are these classes from, for quick reference?

For evil orcs, see Tolkien. For orcs that could go either way by your point of view or whether they happen to be actively worshipping demons at the time, see the Warcraft series. For good orcs, see Dominic Deegan. You're the DM. Take your pick. In Tolkien, orcs are inherantly evil because...

True. I must have skipped over where you listed the spells per day though, and I reread it at least half a dozen times looking for where you listed that... which was why I asked.

I'd change the deflection bonus to AC to a shield bonus to AC instead. Deflection better covers supernatural "force field" type effects, because it alters the touch AC AND the flatfooted AC. I don't see this as a supernatural type of ability. He already gets uncanny dodge, after all...

How many spells per day? Or is this an "at will" sort of thing?

The problem with simply making it a high-lord over and over again, is that it's going to end up with infinite str, dex, con, wis, int, cha... which means that all your calculations so far will be for nothing! Which really sucks...

There are two questions here. #1) Is it a good idea to pull the lever? No, no it is not. Pulling levers of unknown function is not a good idea. #2) Would you/should you pull the lever anyway? Possibly. Might be fun. Edit: Addendum - If, say, for example, I was in the middle of an...

This is an old argument, and I can see both sides of the issue. The other side, is, of course, that a monk is considered to have a natural weapon at all times it would be considered beneficial to have them. A feat is an effect, there's no real arguing that. The argument comes in that some...

I don't know, the concept of a secretive assassin with a code of honor requiring duels with the target sounds like a cool concept to me, and combinging the Invisible Blade with the Duelist class sounds like a reasonably way to go about making such a thing... And there's no real question about...

Dang, that is fantastically awesome. The gold paint really made the seraphim far more majestic, and the perspective just MAKES the whole piece. I do wish the tarrasque could have stayed in, but... eh... this is cool enough as it is.