Search results

Unless you enjoy reading RPG books by themselves, which many people do. And you never know when you're going to come across some idea what could be useful in whatever game you are playing.

Plus he considered everything produced by other people for TSR to be TSR IP, while claiming he was exempt from that rule, even though he made a show of signing the same agreement as everyone else. He basically made it up as he went along. Since WotC acquired TSR's IP, they acquired the D&D...

All y'all tends to be used for emphasis, such as when you're a tad upset and wish to emphasize your displeasure with everyone present: "Bleep ALL y'all!'

Indeed. Especially since the "any more" suggests that previous editions had no such errors at all, which is obviously incorrect.

Take it from someone with a degree in business: your perception is inaccurate. You don't even see the vast majority of the marketing function, because it takes place internally. You're presumably thinking of advertising only, and even then only a subset of advertising.

So they said something accurate, and then some people started saying it meant something different. If that's what we're talking about, I'm even less convinced now.

Not an apt comparison at all, so far as I can tell. They didn't apply some kind of restrictive qualifier to it. Instead they used certain words that some people seem to think means they're being deceptive, but no one has provided any evidence of that.

I just stumbled on this on tsrarchive.com. There is a French edition of basic D&D that was dated in 1982, and it looked like this: And here's the back, which shows the 1982 date: I find this interesting since this is essentially the BECMI trade dress (most notably the D&D logo, but also...

I didn't say no one, and I'm not "parroting" it (a very dismissive term). I square it very easily - huge numbers of people are still introduced to the game by their friends. Lots of people are aware of it, but if they bring some friends in to play the game, the OGL isn't exactly a vital piece of...

Ironically I think Mearls is too far inside the industry to analyze it. Attributing anything significant to the OGL issue is silly. The attitude of an average D&D player to the OGL is "what's an OGL?" People in the industry, and people who spend time here, are not representative of the market...

Reminds me of a YouTuber (Caelan Conrad) critiquing the Potter books including the line "she's not creative, you're just American."

Yes the summary of the deal I was responding to mentioned that it would include cessation of payments for the place in Hollywood.

You failed to consider that much of this amount would be replacing other things that Gygax was previously receiving from the company - royalties, the mansion, etc. So much of it was not new cashflow, just restructuring it. And as someone mentioned, the amount for the shares themselves would have...

Yes, that's correct, people draw arbitrary lines as to what they call lore and not lore. That was my point.

This is true. Fortunately for me, my point is that some people don't realize the things they say aren't lore are functionally no different than things they say are lore, because of how they're used to the game being presented. So I'm actually focusing on a more precise use of the term, rather...

The game I run now hews much closer to Western European folklore than it does to modern fantasy tropes. Designing a game like that really helps you see the lore that is created by even "the basics" that people are talking about. The fact that clerics heal and wizards do not - that's lore. The...

Tolkien's conception of elves and dwarves have permeated modern fantasy to such a degree that you don't have to be familiar with his writing at all to be immersed in those archetypes. His elves and dwarves, and thus the elves and dwarves of modern fantasy, are pretty far from those of folklore...

The fact that there are elves in the world is, in and of itself, lore. It's just standard modern fantasy lore that you're used to.