Search results

As pure mechanics, I'm not seeing any problems with this race immediately, but that's because I understand what you're going for. In terms of wording and comprehensive language, this is all over the place and feels somewhat rushed. Take your time to flesh out the race's description and then...

Okay, go into the Player's Handbook and look at how the races are written. All of the abilities are written in easy to understand language. For instance, you don't see "Hellish Rebuke: Melee Spell Attack; one target; etc." It's written as a sentence so players can just glean the information they...

You need to adjust the language of this race concept. It's not a monster's stat block, man. Don't write it like one. Write it like a racial text entry in the PHB. Also, as a personal recommendation, I think the Strength-Draining Strike should be a number of times per long rest equal to the...

Well, recently, my product was taken off of DM's Guild, so darn. Anybody interested in checking it out, hit me up with a mention and I can link it.

I like your homebrew here, it's pretty well done. If you're interested, check out mine on the DM's Guild. Just look up Warforged and you should find it at the top result.

This is the older version. You can find the finished version here. http://www.dmsguild.com/product/172656/5th-Edition-Warforged?term=warforged&test_epoch=0

All well and good, but it's going to take time to get everything in order.

Is there anyone I could talk to about getting this? I would pay for this if I could, but I just don't have money.

I finally got around to replying; I ended up taking my Warforged race concept down and reposted it to the DM's Guild. I figured why not make some money off of it. I put a lot of effort into it.

I've been doing what I can to support the community. When I find some "Pay What You Want" content that turns out really decent, I try to go back to it and send some money their way. I like that it's a creative vent for people, but I wish the community more readily supplied constructive...

I've been more closely reading it and it feels like "Unbreakable" is too strong. It's monk counterpart didn't grant advantage and I would advise against it modifying saving throws at all. The ability to reroll is fine, though.

I'll play test the update as it stands and just give them the Unarmored Defense. See how it plays. The Unarmored Defense feature is definitely flavorful and greatly benefits the class, but it's understandable that one might want to remove it. I can understand why lowering the hit dice was...

Just noticed that you took away the d12 Hit Dice. I think that it was fine, given that all their damage mitigation comes from Temporary HP. If you make the "Dig Deep" ability cost a Moxie point in addition to its exhaustion, it should free up the space for them to have the Unarmored Defense and...

I think the Unarmored Defense was a key feature to this class. It made them feel like the archetypal rabble rouser. Aside from that, the new version looks perfectly balanced.

In case you don't see it, I edited my comment above.

Though the reworking of Haymaker is good.

I apologize, I realize this is too strong. It overshadows the Cross Counter, which is a pretty staple ability for that particular archetype.

Sure, let me see it, though I'm already pretty happy with what I've found.

I'll need to play around with this, but as it stands, this is my character, Armstrong, to a T and I love it. I'll let you know if there's anything that needs fixing after some rigorous playtesting.

http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?465921-5e-Dvati-Rework This is a rehash of the old 3.5 race, the Dvati. If you don't know about them, you should be able to find them online somewhere. There's holes in what its mechanics address, but that's to leave room for DMs to adjudicate as...