Search results

Out of curiosity, which versions (authors) are you using? There is such a mountain of material on DMs Guild it’s helpful to have some directions to go in from folks who have used the material.

You could always give them an flat initiative number plus Dex mod (like 20 + Dex). Enemies could roll for initiative normally modified by Dex (or even Wisdom or Intelligence to notice something is awry if you want to represent hyper-aware or genius level adversaries). That way it’s most likely...

I thought I’d hate it but was pleasantly surprised. A lot more enjoyable than I thought it would be. Nothing earth-shattering but some fun sequences and enjoyable characters.

Gender-shifting elves? Thumbs up. Enormous-bobble-balloon-headed halflings? Thumbs down. That is where I prefer to direct my nerd rage.

If you're talking about an end of campaign huge boss fight with a god-like being such as Tiamat... There are certainly other god-like beings with agendas contrary to those of the one you're fighting who may just boost your magical punch for one fight. For a price. Or a little favor. Or if you...

Looks like Hexblade is still on the list as Hexblades's Curse is still listed in two invocations. Sent from my iPhone using EN World

I'd love to see them take another crack at the swarm druid from 4e. That was a flavorful take on the class. Loved it but never got to play it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Awesome!

Someone in an earlier thread like this suggested the -5/+10 rule be allowed once per target per turn. That way your high level fighter with multiple attacks could potentially cleave through multiple weaker enemies, yet it still addresses the concern of a negligible penalty translating into...

I really like this version. The 4e bard was great and the 2e bard was fun. I liked the quirkiness of the 1e bard but it was too much jumping around imho. And it took too long to become one. Makes me wish there was a skald build though. I really liked Monte Cook's version of the bard in the Book...

Boo hoo John Wick. It's old school and awesome.

Level 3 and up. I've had to start over at level 1 several times due to new campaigns, moving, things falling apart online, etc. so honestly I'm just a bit tired of very low level play. That doesn't mean I won't jump into a low level game - hell I'd play in a second. [emoji846]

Really looking forward to this one. I'm excited to see how this is going to be presented in 5e. :-D

The Autarch guys are awesome. They make some incredibly well-thought out, great material. If you're an OSR person, I think their stuff is a must-have, particularly if you have any interest in trade and mercantile ventures, large scale battles, or high level play. I can only imagine how much the...

I really like sorcerers, but I do have a houserule for them. In my campaign sorcerers gain a number of metamagic options at 3rd level equal to their Charisma modifier, and an additional metamagic choice at 6th, 10th, and 17th (and whenever their Charisma modifier increases). This gives a high...

Good to know! I enjoy reading the content but have a prohibitively difficult time doing so on my iPhone. Nice to see I'll be able to view it on my desktop.

Awesome. Sauce.

I'm all for it! I think it'd be an awesome subclass for the bard. There needs to be some jester-specific bard spells like summon rubber chicken and hallucinatory poo...

Looking good! Always a fan of Ari's contributions to my home brew. ;-) I can always use new cleric domains and I really like the thaumaturge school. Awesome.

I think the complexity is within the boundaries of the subclass and not overly complicated in any case - the player will be invested in the mechanic because they chose it beforehand, like a sorcerer or monk. And if you've ever played 13th age, it's pretty intuitive once you've done it for a...