Search results

Thoughts? Um, how would you feel if you made a good faith sale of your campaign setting at a very low price to a company that then proceeded to use a bizarre love triangle to change a pantheon of deities that you crafted reasonably carefully? I understand that FR needs to change, and...

I have no problem with the idea of a reboot but it's the execution that is worrying me. A "bizarre love triangle" is no way, IMO, to provide a backstory for a major campaign change. It's inconsistent with what has gone before and just adds a touch more of the "oh, it's that campaign setting" to...

Of course it was utterly stupid. Read anything that the RPGA did with FR. It wasn't the fault of the setting: it was the 12 year olds in the RPGA who ruined things. I mean, this is the same group who named a cleric of Sune after a p0rn actress. It's that sort of infantile/puerile attitude that...

I like all three but I have to give mind flayers the win simply because I have been using them since about 1982. 25 years of illithid-y goodness! ;)

I agree with the concept of a reboot but I think any reboot has to be in the context of an overall consideration of what strategy to apply to developing the setting. The fundamental problem is that as soon as you think you have a decent handle on the setting as a DM, along comes a novel or...