Search results

This was Bing's AI image creator.

I didn't see much sketch art, so I will throw this in. This was a single prompt with no revisions.

I like the cover art better than the actual Vecna adventure cover art. Great scene depicted there.

I see. They were compatible, but the time frame of the release meant they didn't really have to be compatible.

Oops... maybe I answered too soon. Thank you both for the answers.

Thanks Hussar. I must have remembered it incorrectly. And the time frame, I do remember it being a bit quick, but two years - wow! Thanks again for the answer.

Thank you. I appreciate the answer, especially from someone with your perspective. But, and I could be wrong, I remember them consistently stating that 3rd edition was compatible with 3.5. Am I remembering that wrong?

I feel like this is a very fair sentiment. It, at the very least, should be acknowledged, and then answered if possible. I personally do not know the answer, so I am curious.

I think this is an important designation. I mean, it doesn't even have to be the two extremes. It could be people at the table have buy in, but this one player really wants to see how this class feature or something from the "new" plays out. And that is the slippery slope. I don't think, at...

I am not tip-toeing around anything. The thread asked if you will adopt the new edition. I said yes, and then expanded the discussion by stating that most will adopt - even if they think they won't. And the reasons for that are... ☝️ this. Thank you for proving my point. The DM really is the...

I was being hyperbolic to prove a point. Also, the MMORPG statistics are very clear, a very large majority will choose the stronger archetype when the choice is clear.

Players will choose what is right for them. Some players that want to be great in combat will choose any broken combo they can. Others won't dive deep enough to figure out the broken combos. And others will actively avoid them and instead play based off the story and their roleplay. None of...

I would like the forum to know that in a few years after 2024 comes out, they will only use the 2024 version on the official D&D site. This will make the adoption even more widespread, as so few young players seem to own the books. They just look stuff up online. D&D Beyond and whatever VTT they...

For most DMs, it is not an authoritarian table. It is a group game, and everyone gets a vote. So while you may not want to deal with power creep, the players might want to have a (fill in the class) that they consider better.

Ok. I see your side. I just don't agree. I consider Pathfinder, both editions, different games from D&D. But your view seems equally valid.

Just so I am not mischaracterized here, I do not think the player base is obsessed with power. I think they want to make the character they like, and for most players, they want their character to be effective. So when given two clear options of the same class, they will always choose the most...

I agree. I think it would not only help players, but also the designers.

We'll just have to agree to disagree then. I will leave you with a question: Are people playing Pathfinder (1st or 2nd edition) playing D&D?

We do not know that they nerfed it. But the probability of the classes getting stronger is a thousand times greater than WotC making them weaker. If they do nerf the warlock it will not appear that way. (I do not think they will. Instead, I think they will make it comparable, and then dress it...