Search results

The point isn't so much the weapons themselves as it is that if you are unarmored and surrounded by surprise you should not just be able to blithely rush into combat.

As a DM, I have a lot of trouble with this concept. The PCs are surrounded in a surprise attack. They are wearing no armor, and their weapons are sheathed. Twelve crossbowmen have their deadly weapons trained on the hearts of the PCs. Things seem tense. Then, out of game, one player says...

That's true, but the thread-starter hasn't replied to this yet (that's why I'm quoting it here). He CANNOT be a pally 8/rogue 5 half fiend gestalt. He CAN be a Pally 5/Rogue5 half-fiend gestalt, with an effective level of 10 or 11. I'm getting the feeling that either you mis-typed something, or...

And no doubt the vicious Drow Warhamster will be a new unit in Warhamster 40000. Hooray for the Hamster drow, and LOLth, their god of funny hamsters.

Maybe you would have Artificers that use Science (or Tech or whatever they call it). And d20 modern could use it too, if it ever goes 4E-style

Sorry Dustyboots, but I am new enough to the game that (even though I have of course read Tolkien) I do not think that "halfling" should mean portly, hairy-footed midget. Though it might drive the grognards crazy, I personally think that in DnD the Tolkienesque hobbit seems very silly, existing...

But the thing about gelatinous cubes is that they take up almost all of that space. So would one have to rule this based on the size of the creature? For example, a tiny invisible creature might stand almost no chance of being accidentally hit, whereas an invisible human in the path of an arrow...

Would you let a PC have a chance of hitting an invisible guy if the path of their ranged attack passed through his square? For example, if I=invisible monster ---=path of arrow C=character X=targeted sqaure C----I---X Would you let the attack hit? Maybe have a -2 penalty to hit for each...

RigaMortus2, sorry about my lack of clarity. I was trying to say that moving away after attacking provokes AoOs, not the whole process.

One of my players is playing a monk that has taken the spring attack feat. We are having a disagreement over how Spring Attack provokes AoOs against the person being attacked. The feat text specifically says "moving in this way does not provoke an attack of opportunity from the defender you...

In progress and in use. It evolves during every session.

Mmm...yummy veal. Where can I get tickets for the next show, PKitty?

1) The personal chaplain of the Noble family of a very religious society has lost the favor of his god years ago, but still continues on in his position. The family cannot get rid of him because of the embarrassment and loss of power it would entail. 2) In a Dwarven family, the line has a...

Piratecat, I grovel before thee. May an inkling of thy ratbastardy be bestowed upon my humble form. :P As a note: Total agreement here. Players are VERY good at screwing things up. A touch of faux-malicious creativity can make the whole thing perfect.

An RBDM and RBPCs! Everything's better with a Rat Bastard DM and Rat Bastard PCs to go with it! My group and I have so much fun with it!

I'm pretty sure I'll switch

I believe you mean classic anime writers.

Does the Hold Person spell work on a Half-Celestial elf? The type CHANGES to native outsider, so I don't know that it counts.

wow, good catch!

The minotaur is supposed to have a level adjustment of +2. However, with +8 strength and full BAB from the animal levels, along with good ref and fort saves, and a special gore attack with mega damage after a charge, it ends up being FAR to powerful. The party I run for is level 7. What Level...