Search results

My apologies. :)

You're kidding, right? :/ Please explain to me how.

Rogue=Seth Macfarlane as Peter. :D

Me likes! Very fitting. :)

Then clearly you're not working hard enough. ;)

Yeah, I think there might be. D&D is cooperative. Give and take. And, honestly, judging from your posts, it sounds like its "you" who is taking, not your players. That is your opinion, though I believe you may be in the minority. Hence that is the reason why the books are written as they...

Agreed. I've also noticed this "confrontational" stance in the thread regarding the possible power source of the Monk, and your rather brutal denouncement of Psionics. Perhaps you should try being a bit more "flexible"? Or perhaps "compromising"? Just a suggestion. :) Edit: This post is...

This.

Updating Ravenloft would be fine too.

I picked "yes". Something that has a dark theme similar to Ravenloft would be nice. :)

Ohhhh.....too slow, Lizard. Eleran already showed me the error of my ways. ;) As for the "twice per encounter" mechanic, I believe it does exist, as the cleric's Healing Word is usable twice per encounter. Edit: Curse you Lacyon! Now it is I who has been ninja'd. :D

LMAO! Reminds me of that Family Guy Episode: Peter: I want this and this. (holds out two candy bars) Lois: You can have "one", Peter. Peter: But that man over there got two. Lois: "I don't care" what the other men are getting, you're only getting one. Peter: I HATE you... :D

I see your point. Having it as an at will ability would be a tad too strong. :)

To be honest, I rarely look at D&D's economy and how it functions. I just assume that it does. And why not just assume? I mean, I playing Dungeons & Dragons, not Economies & Economists (though an Economist would be a fearsome Solo foe, no doubt. :p). Anyways, I don't understand why...

Probably Wizard with warlord training. Maybe Cleric. Can't really decide between the two. I like the idea of playing a stern Wizard Commander, but I do like to play clerics too... Decisions, decisions... ;)

First, let me just say, that was very well written. I too entered D&D through the reading of various fantasy novels, and you do bring up some very valid points in your post. Somwtimes it was fun to play a character who was just starting off and was relatively weak when compared to the world at...

Ya know, I just have to ask: Why is this such a "bad" thing? It's not like it's a gamebreaker or anything. If you want to look at it in a positive light, you can see it's two players working together to achieve a common goal, and it only works against one creature at a time. If you "don't" see...

D&D 4e just keeps looking better and better. I can't wait to get my hands on those books so that I can start decapitating some Orc Bloodragers...assuming, of course, they don't decapitate me first! :p

My isn't the best either, but I've found that this expression is synonmous with agreement. Best explaination I can give. :)