Search results

It depends upon the meaning of neutral. If neutral means objective then they would be called Subterranean elves and would not have dark skin and eyes because those adaptions are to compensate for strong UV light exposure (strong sunlight). Depending upon how much UV there would be...

Can be, not must be. I don't understand your point. How is this a disagreement with what I said? Yes, as I said, the glyph is the thing that is harmful to the other creatures, as it says in the sentence. The harm comes vis-à-vis the glyph... because it's harmful. Then they're not following the...

There can be as much diversity in elf types, as NPCs, as desired by the GM and players. My preference as a GM and player is to not have any elf PCs. Elves should be exotic and not living in human settlements. They are too far-removed from the dynamics of human life (like human mortality) to be...

If this were true then most people would choose to live as hermits rather than in civilizations. Structure (rules) actually enhances freedom by increasing quality of life. One finds more freedom in a higher rules environment (civilization) than in isolation. That said, the rules need to suit...

• That wording clearly states that the glyph must be harmful. There is also nothing in the wording that supports a prohibition on portability. It even specifically gives two options that are readily portable (books and scrolls). • The "other creatures" part also specifies that the glyph is...