Search results

What's unique about the D&D we have now? We have devils who are trying to control everything and demons who are trying to bring it all down to their level. At the basic core, this is no different than what we have now. The fluff is better thought out, according to what little we know, than...

At will, of course.

The only problem with this is now they have to design 24 more classes, effectivly, since now they fighter(who is currently designed to be a good defender) now needs enough stuff to make an effective controler(however that would work), striker, or leader. But, if you want to do...

While it's confirmation that there is going to be a Ranger, it's not confirmation that the ranger is going to be in PHB1. I tend to agree with you though, I think the ranger is going to be in PHB1. We just don't have confirmation yet. :)

That's an interesting idea. Forcing your opponent to reroll a successful attack/spell/ability. Spell Resistance is rather on/off anyways. :)

I have a very different defination of metagaming than you do, apparently. The only way we have of interacting with the model of the world is through the rules. Using those rules is not, imo, metagaming. I have seen people use feints to get enemies to react the way they want them to in both...

That's only about 4th level, without improving it with feats. The basis for balancing encounters in 3.5 is supposed to be 4 encounters per day of a EL equal to the average party level. All of these have the same caveat that they will last for 5 rounds after whatever if preventing the...

I don't think this is metagaming. Think of it this way: "If I dodge around a bit to draw out the giants attack, while he's recovering from that, I'll have time to heal the cleric." That's not metagaming, is it?