Search results

5ekyu is on to something here. I may have more to say later when I have had more time. I have thought and do think that the rules for vision and light are logistically and narratively onerous. DEFCON1 if you handwaive vision and light aren't you essentially nerfing those with DV? Is the rule...

I like metal. I would buy these.

I pretend they aren't there. They pretend to believe me.

I post here. Nowhere else aside from a private message here or there. Do you know why? Because Morrus doesn't track my often changed opinion or interest and punish me with ads and ads and ads and intrusion on any and all other websites. I may change....but I view other website practices as trollish

BECMI stuff and the Monstrous Manual.

If weapon styles were tied to the weapon proficiency. Each could have a few key moves and not be locked into such dogmatic instistance as a greatsword must be used with two hands. Alternatively styles could be disassociated from weapons and become more about movement, positioning, and...

Look back at encounters that the rogue did shine in. Consider the elements that promoted that and introduce them in more encounters. Enemies with damaging auras that trigger at the end of the players turn. This makes cunning action a lifesaver. Raging enemies: enemies that effectively double...

Weapon styles should be included with proficiency. Weapon styles as presented in D&D are terribly boring but that is another kettle of fish.

What is in the party that is outshining the rogue?

One elf. One set of stat bonuses and special abilities. I would say Dexterity and Charisma. Most elf sub-races make me think that someone wanted an elf (or a beautiful pointy eared human that can be a snob and call it RP) AND wanted the best stats for whatever character class they intended to play.

I would give feats a 6 out of 10 for stifling creativity and a 8 out of 10 for reducing options.

Role playing aside it seems inflexible to me because EB is clearly superior to weapons for warlocks. Short rest dependency is a crap shoot because it is campaign and DM dependent. (As all things are but I argue that this is a bigger make it or break it point for the warlock) Warlock is...

Forgotten Realms and The Known World

Frankly, I am shocked that assassin has been eliminated.

Ancestral Guardian (B) 20 Battle Master (F) 19 Cavalier (F) 20 Champion (F) 4+1=5 Inquisitive (R) 10-2=8 Kensei (M) 22 Mastermind (R) 21 Open Hand (M) 22 Samurai (F) 18 Scout (R) 22 Shadow (M) 25 Storm Herald (B) 16 Sun Soul (M) 20 Swashbuckler (R) 22 Thief (R) 17 Totem Warrior (B) 18

Forge Domain 10 Knowledge Domain 6 Life Domain 6+1=7 Light Domain 10 Tempest Domain 10 Trickery Domain 1-2=0 A bit of overkill but well deserved.

This tracks almost exactly whith my history. It really is uncanny.

Help us oh Math.

So could you also swear fealty to another king? Or make a pact with another merchant? Since there appears to be no exclusivity clause in your oath or your pact. If you can not, why can't you? Making a pact to trengthen yourself for service sounds good. Is there anyone who would be off limits...

Imagine being the knight under a king. Now imagine making a longstanding binding contract with someone else. Royalty gets a bad rap when it comes to disloyalty cosmic beings even moreso.