Search results

Flawed logic. Labeling something "most honest" in no way labels other things dishonest. Its not a true/false question, its a sliding scale. Would it have felt more appropriate to you had i said "my favorite?" Then you respond with "how could I have a favorite if I haven't yet seen all the...

The most honest answer we will ever see

Fair, but then you are making someone else the worst at the table. Why not just use a different class?

Since day 1 of 5e, and probably RPGs in general, someone always seems to bring up a "fix" for their favorite class. The problem i have is that no 5e class really needs it. Is there a disparity between the best and worst? Of course, and that is OK. Its natural. In a list of things there will...

If your issue is number of spels known this certainly helps. Have you expanded it out to the other sub-classes yet?

It just occurred to me that I CAN still play 2e Dark Sun instead of praying for a 5e conversion... talk about obvious solutions.

I'm guessing you aren't used to people calling you on your naughty word. Did you read the post? It was a crap-storm of the "Sorcerer is too powerful because..." and an equal whine-fest of "nuh-uh, its too weak," all wrapped up in a nice big bow "zero consensus." Thats the point you refuse to admit...

Oh, I'm sorry. I'm not arguing that any of what was posted is "right" or "wrong." If I gave you that impression then I apologize. What I am saying is that the assertion that sorcerors are in need of a fix because there is a problem with the class AND THAT THIS IS A POPULAR AND ACCEPTED VIEW is...

https://forums.giantitp.com/showthread.php?571807-Why-Ever-use-Sorcerer This would be a small sample. It basically boils down to their ability never be counter spelled and to nova so much harder than wizards. Sorry for the delay. Mother's day stuff

I feel obligated to direct you to another forum involving giants and playgrounds where they swear up and down about how incredibly OP sorcerers are, and how anyone playing a wizard has some sort of mental handicap. I think they are just as judgement-impaired as the folks over here saying the...

Dominate ______, Power Word ______, Disintegrate, Hold _____, Polymorph, Greater Invisibility, Banishment... thats just off the top of my head. The only semi-legitimate complaint is that sorcerors should probably get a few bonus spells based on bloodline or that its hard to play a ______...

Rapey gods. Its really all you need.

I agree with everything you said here, but a Con based "Blood Mage" with a limited casting, or a feat that allows taking Con damage to boost spellcasting would both be thematically gratifying.

First, what is wrong with Sorcerers as written? They are already a popular choice at many tables.