Search results

Some of these make sense. And then the other half of it is just dumb. Oops, should I even use the word "dumb" to describe it? /sarcasm Progressiveness is fine, but you can go so far left you end up going right. Censorship isn't a solution.

PF2e should've never happened. Plenty were happy with PF1e. Between WotC ditching 3e and Paizo ditching PF1e, I'm done supporting TTRPGs with the constant "Edition Cycles." All I see when I look at PF2E and their new material and APs is "Man, I could have been enjoying this in my PF1e games...

Hated the god awful change and restructuring of D&D when it went from 3e to 4e, and I have no care for 5e. None of it is even remotely the same as before. I moved to Pathfinder 1e thinking it would last, or at least it would continue to benefit from even a little support (say a Bestiary of...

The content warning is so ridiculous. There is such a thing as going so far left, you end up going right. Someone playing D&D and getting triggered by Feywild memory loss...exactly how many people could possibly be affected by that?

Is this official?

We'll never see stuff like that again in D&D with how WotC produces things since 5e.

Back when D&D was a good and expansive game. Not anything like what's out these days.

We calling this 6th Edition yet or what?

Yeah like some silly thing saying "The beliefs of the factions in these books are purely fictional and are not based on any real-world religious doctrines. Such comparison are purely coincidental" or some such nonsense.

Except those cosmologies exist WITHIN the Great Wheel Cosmology. Planescape should be rebranded more as an Omniverse than a Multiverse. Eberron has been explained as being in its own crystal sphere, cut off from everything else, and the 3 dragon overgods built their own cosmology within it...

That's the problem with consumers such as yourself. YOU may not be able to ever use them, but I guarantee everything you don't ever use, someone else's game actually does benefit from it. My philosophy has been the same; "I may not ever use it, but if the day comes I need it, it's great to know...

2 spells... 5e is such a joke. A campaign book back then would have given us 20 spells, minimum.

Stuff us PF1e fans will never get to play in our campaigns. That's just lovely of a company to ditch its original consumer base and fans like that. Reminds me of another company that did the exact same with the 3E crowd...:cautious:

I remember the days when D&D players weren't so insanely sensitive to everything. I agree on some progressiveness, but go too far and the lines blur completely into censorship of every single "potentially offensive" thing...and you lose creativity and freedom of expression at that point.

Yayyy...more new content for PF2e that us PF1e fans won't ever be able to play with since Paizo doesn't want to convert some new PF2e material to 1e for us. First me and my players can't use the Inventor class for our 1e games, now these two classes. But they'll gladly convert to 5e, however...

Which I think is a stupid mistake. Even a little support would suffice. There's so much in PF2e I want to use in my PF1e games and I can't because converting them doesn't exactly work properly. The systems are too different. Yet they have the resources to convert all of Abomination Vaults for...

Yeah they'll be revisited once every 5 years probably at the snail pace of book releases they're doing since 5e came out.

Again how is this not 6th Edition? I'd love to see the argument in that one LOL

My friend has been wanting to run Starfinder forever, and we're all good for it, but he's having misgivings and might wait until Starfinder 2E which is a year and a half away. My issue is, SF2E won't have much options in comparison to SF1e. By the time SF2e picks up big, it's 2030. Trying to...

Ok, so the big question is, how did anyone know it was AI art to begin with? Is there a tool that detects this and someone got bored and decided to use it on the book's art?