Search results

  1. Enrahim2

    Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.

    Sorry my mistake, correct formulation is "no longer authorized" as you say. By the way, this source give a bit more context to that statement tha the Gizmodo quote more clearly showing that the language us used in the explicit context of stating that 1.1 is an "update to the previously available...
  2. Enrahim2

    Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.

    If not taking into consideration the highly problematic use of the word "deauthorized": What is there there in the press release/leak that make you think wizards do not want to be part of the ogl1.0a ecosystem in the sense of allowing things to be published under 1.1 using material from 1.0a?
  3. Enrahim2

    What's All This About The OGL Going Away?

    The new thing is that previously wizards didnt have an obvious way to exploit this open gaming content commercialy. With their aqisition of D&D beyond, and planned VTT, they have. Combined with an obvious effort to at least marginalise any potential competitors in the electronic space, they are...
  4. Enrahim2

    New OGL - what would be acceptable? (+)

    There are two layers of acceptability in this context. One is what I would consider publishing new content under, the other is what would not significantly alter my consumer patterns. As for the first I think a requirement would be anything that do not give wizards any clear priveleged rights...
  5. Enrahim2

    Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.

    When reading the leak, I was quite certain the leaked "deauthorized" language was only refering to the asymmetry formulation in section 9. Hence the only legal meaning of the term would be that 1.1 content could not be distributed under 1.0a, while 1.0a content could still be freely copied...
  6. Enrahim2

    Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.

    What is wrong with my reasoning: The main suspicion seem to be that wizards want to prevent new things to be published under 1.0a There are as far as I can see nothing we know indicating they will not try to formulate it so that 1.0a is still valid for the content already published under 1.0a...
  7. Enrahim2

    Stop telling me to boycott WotC. If you support open gaming, tell who to support. (+ thread)

    The big problem with this question is that it actually highlights how cruel what WotC is doing is from an open lisence perspective: The real strength of an open license is that it defines a boundary where everyone can contribute to it growing, and feel assured that it is not misused by someone...
Top