Search results

I run about half the time in a set(ie published) campaign setting, most recently Dark Sun. The other half are campaign settings i make up (though I often use published world maps) Many of my concepts just do not fit published worlds. My name tabletop game I will be running is a pirate themed 4E...

done

Im not sure if Ill get 5E but a lot of interesting ideas here.

Ill do it for dice!!

I have not played an RPG that uses luck as an attribute, but several have feats or advantages that do the same thing, more or less. I am a fan of that kind of system, as it is another aspect to a character and aid \s character building. Being good is better, but on occasional occasions, lucky...

Kudos for trying something interesting like this. I am not much of a writer, so I won't be taking you up on it, but i hope you gets some good people.

I think any player who takes this feat deserves a lot of scrutiny. That said, allowing them to stack vow with a powerful form is definitely out of bounds.

Classless = not an RPG, too funny. I like D&D for its classes, and I like other systems for their lack of classes. So many good choices out there for roleplaying. PErsonally, I want D&D to keep classes. No need to totally throw out the baby. That said, I would prefer to see classes a bit less...

I will be happy to pick and choose particular minis from these sets like I do the pathfinder minis.

This is exactly my big problem with companies offering only pdfs. Great money-saver for them, and makes the business model a lot better, but the options to print cheaply and well just are not there.

I wonder why the OP feels the need to argue his point here, as his target is elsewhere. Seems a waste of time to me. Good ego trip though.

To me this gets into the social aspects of the game, the social contract, if you will. At most tables, and mine for sure, we agree not to abuse things and the DM agrees not to abuse players. It is just not fun on either side of the screen in the end. Sure, figuring out a great tactic and using...

I am pretty sure that Complete Arcane or Complete Mage had a master specialist prestige class that allowed more narrow specialization, which is close to what you want. Maybe, instead of taking two in one school your DM would allow you to take one bonus spell in each school. I do believe there...

I really want to see a strong dose of 1E's randomness and less of 4E and 3.x's rigid decision making. Not picking on those editions, but they are far less random. Randomness meaning things like potion miscibility chances of dragons sleeping tables to randomly make dungeons and the like/

What is with the Misfit Studios spam?

Nah. My groups is pretty much totally unaware of the anniversary.

Maybe they can handle this subject well, but if so it will be a first.

Well, I have little interesting 5E atm, and am waiting to see what is released in August. I will get the base books, more than likely, and see what I have to work with.

Seems odd to have 6 stretch goals before being actually funded.

I vastly prefer to buy books, or paper modules. Pdfs are ok for reference, but not much else.