Search results

Kobold Adventurer- Psions were mentioned a few months back in relation to Wizards.

I'm so angry with this, I'm going to slam the door on them! /ragequit /ragejoin /ragequit /ragejoin /ragequit

I'm looking at perceptions of the entire outcome. So I don't think it actually matters what WotC could have handled better in reality, only that there is a perception they mishandled it and Pathfinder resulted from that mishandling.

The OP asked what 4E will be remembered for. The thing is, I don't think what was actually true about the edition matters; it's more what people see. So, based on this thread and similar arguments across the internet, I will say it will probably be remembered for three things: Division - It...

What? Wizards have reasonable limitations and can't cast spells while wearing heavy armor and tanking everything? Fighters are not wizard familiars?] Rogues actually contribute? My third-level wizard can't make a +15 vorpal sundering ghost-touch elf-bane gnome-bane human-bane orc-bane...

I never banned, but I informed players up-front that I do play racial hatreds up-front. Amazingly, the player who made a drow didn't protest when they ended up in jail the entire time the party was in an elf settlement. But the player also didn't make a drow again after that.

To answer the original post, my entire group's experience can be summed up like this: "That's it? This is... You know, maybe we should try Shadowrun for awhile." Then they heard of Pathfinder. Eventually, they broke up; they didn't like 4E Shadowrun, had a bad time with Savage Worlds at first...

I've looked at 5E, and I love the return to FR and the more simplified system, but... It just doesn't grab me. There's nothing about it I really see as anything special. These days, I'm heavily tied into Pathfinder, Savage Worlds, Numenera, and World of Darkness. I'm also looking forward to The...

Huh. So I guess I can't suggest they name a planet Shatner. Or Kirk.