Search results

Comparing 5E to earlier editions has taught at least my group that there have been some continued mistakes over multiple editions. For example: 1) We've been playing attacks of opportunity wrong for years, due to a misreading of the 3E PHB and the vague wording being carried over to Pathfinder...

Well, I'm interested, just for trying it out.

You mean that's not what we're doing? Okay, I admit the add-ons are more than a few...

Wow. That is a lot of people. Definitely seeing that this company is doing well.

After some thinking, consulting, drinking, and asking a few of my players... The following are the roles my group agrees actually exist. General Custer: You are the leader of this ragtag bunch of misfits, and despite any failings you may have in other areas all of your plans are tactically...

I don't object either. It would make some sense for those who frequent the inn to know Ilyana anyway :D

Deleted! My apologies, Morrus.

I want people like you in the industry. I may not ever fully understand your viewpoint on life, but I can say there are endless items you can contribute to the roleplaying industry that will benefit it just because of what you know about life. And, the people accepting it is of your viewpoint...

Now this is a good point! There's also something else: That diversity of viewpoints will mean a diversity of information for creating a fantasy game that allows people to truly RP as they wish. More viewpoints are never a bad thing for roleplaying games.

Can I just state something I've observed? This will also show why it is I am an anti-SJW despite believing in the essential goals of equality. Take a look at what ad_hoc said: "Feeling that gender does not matter is a privilege." Okay, that's nice... and isn't that same feeling, one backed by...

On this, we both agree. Plus, as I've stated, having a more inclusive hobby is simple practicality and good for the game. And that's speaking as someone who is one of the anti-SJWs. So, overall, I don't think there is an inherent disagreement between the sides on this one.

Being possibly the biggest anti-SJW person on this site, I can affirm that wanting more women in the business and wanting them to have more input is not solely an SJW decision. I am honestly happy about the make-up of WotC and the fact there are more women. Why? Because all I have to do is open...

Ilyana examines herself in the mirror as she prepares for her show. Her fiery-red hair, which stretches all the way down to her shoulder blades, is held out of her face by a braid that circles across her forehead. Included in the braid are several tiny bells, intended to make noise as she moves...

I prefer point buy. It's easier to translate to online games, tends to be easier to balance around, and it avoids a session needed to just generating characters.

My first instinct on this is to say, "Don't. Have them build entirely new characters instead." It still remains my strongest instinct. 5E uses an entirely different level of power and balance than Pathfinder. Magic items, for example, are not something 5E is really balanced around; having even...

*starts humming the Jeopardy theme*

This brings up an interesting question... Can someone take the basic Greyhawk info and use it as just a loose basis for creating a heavily customized version of Greyhawk? I have a few setting details and mechanics I want to test out, and using a variation of an existing campaign is a lot easier...

5E is definitely looking like it could be my favorite edition. May even give up Pathfinder for it. Still not going to give up Savage Worlds or Numenera (assuming the slump in Numenera games reverses itself). Both of those systems have special places in my heart that 5E just can't fill.

Official MM only. I haven't looked at 3PP sources yet. The shadows are an example that really comes to mind.

Given how it went last time, I don't think it will ever happen. I would love it to happen, though.