Search results

They should rage when any underhanded techniques used by any company.

Erik Mona stated on a Roll for Combat stream on April 26 that Paizo announced Pathfinder Remastered work began a few months ago. The accepted time frame for the phrase "a few months" is 3-5 months. With that wording they may have actually been working on it during December or November of last...

Once again let me reiterate-I have no problem with them printing new books. I have a problem with their misleading statement on January 12 where Paizo inferred they would not need to update the rules. I have a problem when, during a record sales spkie, Paizo did not give new buyers the common...

People really need to look at Paizo a little more critically for doing this.

Just don't split hairs to prove a point here. The statement made on Jan 12 stating that PF 2e doesn't have Wizards' expressions is misleading and should not have been made. As a matter of fact, this is really when Paizo should have announced they will be remastering this edition because...

I hope you're right. They will really impress the RPG community if they create a remaster of the entire game in 9 months including printing time. I hope they thoroughly tested the dozens of changes they are making that will affect thousands of player option combinations. I don't want to see...

Are they going to be able to rename or redesign all of them this time? I mean thay haven't in 14 years so am I being unreasonable to anticipate they may not be able to do it in a project they claim only started a few months ago? It's a catch 22. Either they still use the ones they think are...

Paizo stated multiple times during the OGL scandal they could reprint the Core Rulebook with no attestation or under the ORC. It was written without Wizards' copyrighted expressions of any game mechanics according to their blog post on January 12. The book names are lame because I don't...

Once again let me make this clear. I don't have a problem with Paizo publishing new books to avoid entangelment with Wizards. I have a problem with Paizo's misleading January 12 announcement where they stated in writing on their blog, "our designers and developers wrote the new edition...

My problem is with the lack of transparency and the misleading statements made by this company during January. There was no indication during the sales spike that the rulebooks being purchased were, let's be honest here, being replaced. Using an old rulebook and needing to reference the errata...

Paizo stated they were going to reprint the Core Rulebook without the OGL then under the ORC during the controversy. No mention of new books. They absolutely claimed on several occasions that 2e was designed in a way that it could be printed without OGL attestation. The problem is with the...

Paizo says thanks for buying it's old inventory earlier this year so the company can make it outdated now and make more money. They almost certainly knew they were going to print better books for new players, but Paizo needed to sell out it's old inventory and kept it under wraps because...

I guess I'm a little late on the original question but I definitely find the human to be sincerely lacking at this point with what has been discussed. According to Jeremy Crawford, level 1 feats will not give stat bonuses and will in general not be as powerful as their earlier counterparts...