Search results

  1. stonehead

    ENnies To Ban Generative AI From 2025

    I don't think that's true, where are you getting this information from? The ownership of a piece of artwork (and its IP) almost always goes to the one paying for it. Not to the designer nor to the artist. That's true If AI prompts looked like "draw a curved line from point [240,312] to point...
  2. stonehead

    ENnies To Ban Generative AI From 2025

    Jurisdiction doesn't matter because this isn't a legal question, it's an artistic one. The IP rights typically go to whoever is financing the thing, not who created it. I mean, you can sell the rights to an IP you created, but you can't sell the fact that you were the one who created it. The...
  3. stonehead

    ENnies To Ban Generative AI From 2025

    Ban overall is good in my opinion. We ban steroids in the Olympics because they're a contest of human athletic ability. In a contest of human artistic ability, the same standards should apply. Steroids are still a useful medicine for people with certain health conditions. But they're not...
  4. stonehead

    It's been so long since the last GURPS edition, that the present day is now in the "future" tech level

    I think part of the problem is that GURPS assumes all characters are this specialized. You aren't a competent character who can specialize in one type of gun if you want, you're a gun specialist, who can pay extra to be able to use another type of gun. In most systems, characters are...
  5. stonehead

    It's been so long since the last GURPS edition, that the present day is now in the "future" tech level

    Skills and advantages seem to be pointed using totally different philosophies. Advantages are (very roughly) pointed according to how useful they are to the average adventure. Obviously it's not perfect, because no campaign takes place in the platonic ideal of the average adventure, and there...
  6. 1000006358.jpg

    1000006358.jpg

Top