Search results

  1. Theory of Games

    Should PCs Be Exceptional?

    But what if they have the highest Midichlorian count of anyone in the entire Galaxy? :unsure:
  2. Theory of Games

    D&D General Have Some Class

    ... and THIS is why we couldn't multiclass with the 1e Barbarian :sneaky:
  3. Theory of Games

    TSR Why would anyone want to play 1e?

    I missed this comment and while I agree it was the best Ranger, the 1e Barbarian was an even better Ranger than the Ranger :sneaky:
  4. Theory of Games

    Benevolent GM stance

    This is bad on all levels. Just as bad as the Adversarial GM. Why? Because in both cases the GM is in full control and the players are just bystanders. This is exactly why GMs have been instructed since the very beginning of the ttrpg hobby to be "neutral referees" of the game. GMs are not...
  5. Theory of Games

    D&D General Have Some Class

    Oracles were a problem for awhile there. Spontaneous-casting, foul-mouthed cursing anti-Clerics? I always saw the Cleric as the original Gish so Oracles just took that up a notch. I remember seeing GMs online even banning them :ROFLMAO:
  6. Theory of Games

    D&D General Have Some Class

    Hi En Worlders! So I was reading through some AD&D material and noticed that "era" of D&D really starting bringing us a variety of new classes. My favorite comes to mind and we also had the "kits" (1e & 2e) that could be considered new sub-classes. It could be argued that the kits paved the...
  7. Theory of Games

    TSR Why would anyone want to play 1e?

    @Lanefan your group dropped: gold for X.P. RAW initiative RAW training system weapon speed weapon vs. armor modifiers racial level limits and more Looks like you were playing 3e before it released :ROFLMAO:
  8. Theory of Games

    TSR Why would anyone want to play 1e?

    Don't forget the artwork 😄
  9. Theory of Games

    TSR Why would anyone want to play 1e?

    From this post it seems that it wasn't the system that was as gonzo as your group 😄 The groups I've played with have usually been more "serious", similar to how many experienced chess players engage their game. But IMO the modern ttrpg culture has a much more "waggish" presentation than decades...
  10. Theory of Games

    Blood or Spaghetti Sauce?

    This is great stuff! Although I'd go gonzo-gore with a horror campaign since it fits the genre. Hit Points aren't "meat", they're blood 💀
  11. Theory of Games

    Benevolent GM stance

    Like @bloodtide posted: if puzzles and red herrings are problems, stop using them. Or, make the puzzles easier
  12. Theory of Games

    Blood or Spaghetti Sauce?

    Yeah graphic description isn't ever needed IMO but depending on the ttrpg being used, it can add spice to combat. Like one of the things that always reminds me that D&D isn't SIM is how bloodless the game can be - compared to ttrpgs like GURPS and Mythras. A character losing some HP is nothing...
  13. Theory of Games

    Are Game Lines Smaller Today?

    There's actually more ttrpg books than ever IF you count PDFs (which you aren't). Digital is the way of the modern world: easier to produce, distribute and store. Books are unnecessary and archaic products that drain the planet's ecosystem. I'm glad to see most organizations/companies making the...
  14. Theory of Games

    GMs: When Is Enough Enough?

    Online play can be very similar to that, but the time gets measured in months instead of sessions. Six sessions isn't a lot of time, even if they're four-hour sessions like I used to do F2F. I'd call that more like playtesting than actually running campaigns - campaigns like Queen of the Spiders...
  15. Theory of Games

    GMs: When Is Enough Enough?

    I think yeah - if you have a decent group, everyone can kind of tell when someone isn't having fun. That's part of the cool group mentality of TTRPGs. That's why I really hate stopping a campaign - sometimes the flow of activity is so good.
  16. Theory of Games

    GMs: When Is Enough Enough?

    That's good having a regular group. I've been running games for different groups ever since I first became a DM (high school). But I moved around a lot too. I think I might get bored with the same group actually, but I don't know. You know what the players want from a game due to experience. For...
  17. Theory of Games

    GMs: When Is Enough Enough?

    I'm the same way. When I ran Shadowdark I knew it was a one-time thing before I started. Right now I'm gearing up for another superhero campaign but I have two systems I'm debating: Champions Complete or GURPS Supers. The debate made me start this thread because I want to make sure I have the...
  18. Theory of Games

    Blood or Spaghetti Sauce?

    I read the original MP and I remember when I was a kid older guys playing MP at the FLGS. I only glanced at the newest edition but The Morrow Project has always been impressive to me. There was that one game from Fantasy Games Unlimited - Aftermath - that was kind of like MP. That and...
  19. Theory of Games

    GMs: When Is Enough Enough?

    You are a saint. I normally run what I want BUT sometimes I'll check with players if I have a few options Oh I always have an agenda when I run games: Slam the PCs! I realized decades ago that the harder I make the campaign, the more the players like it. Many players want a challenge, not a...
  20. Theory of Games

    Blood or Spaghetti Sauce?

    I like your style. It's "soft-gore" (y) Right. I was thinking just today about the blood-splatter in Warzone. Ultimately IMO it's all about Simulation: some of us want it as real as we can get it. Not all the time, but at key moments. You are a great GM. I know for a fact that feeling...
Top