Search results

I'd expand that to dissonance between those how want one kind of a game vs the other. I've seen players ruin the game for each other because they weren't willing to compromise on their vision of the game they wanted. IT's not just GM's vs players. I know players who get bent out of shape if...

This is something the few who've never had to deal with the narcissist, or players that just push even when you draw your lines will never get. And sometimes it can be your friends, family, or coworkers just to make it even more uncomfortable. It was never lost people are the same now as...

True I'm mostly pointing out it's normal human behavior and some take it way too far. . I don't blame people for wanting to be awesome. Just too much awesome can be a pain, think a party of 5 Barney Stinsons. Even on player like that gets old fast if you are trying to do a group game.

Orrre statistically one out of 4 of the ones that get rolled should be. But I'd wager most +1 weapons placed in any game never get rolled. DM just says you get a +1 thingy

Yep. It's a game where any DM can set the bar at any level so pretending there is a general baseline set by Devs is just silly. And you see that in modules since 1st ed.

A larger percentage of players than I'd like, love to be the best and most powerful. Modern video games reinforce this. It's not that they want to break the system. They just want to be the best, most powerful, most knowledgeable skill monkey, whatever. It's a human thing. Happens at work and...

Honestly if you don't have MinMaxers (and to be fair the type of encounters DM's throw at parties can turn anyone into a min maxer) and lean more towards roleplaying then 3e is probably the best so far. But if the Min Max mindset takes over it's a race to see who gets Nukes first.

in my experience it really just depends on the party composition. A party high in magic and low in melee would find greater magic resistanct a serious problem. A party with a mage to deal with the magic that is mostly melee will find it annoying. I think this is a lot of the reason CR's are...

yep. merging all the spell lists because it was too hard to keep track of everything was the worst thing they ever did to casters.

This is what most of the failed Star trek stuff lost. the Optimism and eventual happy endings in a universe where morals and ethics trump fear. It's the same thing that made Orville worth watching as well.

I think the problem is that different games tend to make different abilities more powerful. A standard textbook D&D game and STR, Con and Dex are the kings of the table, as combat determines everything. A knowledge and skillbased game and int and wisdom rule. A game where interaction with...

There were scrolls in 1e that anyone could use. They tended to be very expensive and very powerful. Protection from water created a sphere in which no water could touch you for the duration. Or do something like churches selling scrolls of Minor miracle that any who read the scripture can...

I'm not seeing people afraid to use old material. Maybe it's new DM's or people without the time to to fiddle with it. I'll admit when you pull out old stuff and try to balance it in your current game that can seem a bit like playing Jenga but the experienced DM's I know just pull what they...

I think you have missed the point that the game has had so many houseruled playstyles over the years that the devs probably intentionally avoid many of the "terrible" things people rant about online. From the sales perseptive it's better to leave it out and let the individual modify the game...

I really wish all the DnD horror fans had drifted off to other games. I wonder how much of the arguing over overpowered mages and power creep would go away if the horror style players drifted off to games designed to be horror instead of of D&d. It really is a terrible system for you if...

then at least half the people playing it would modify that and do thier own thing. I can imagine it but I can't imagine everyone playing the way you demand.

and honestly most tables don't last long with the "bad" DM's some are talking about. They either learn and get better or lose thier tables.

only if it's cheaper. If they want to cheap out on labor then it should be cheaper for me and everyone else. Though It'll only be temporary. Eventually we'll just be AI creating our own worlds and then won't need to buy thier stuff.

And as long as people have different views,opinions, life experience and varying levels of experience in telling stories and different levels of communication skills and keep entering the position of DM that will continue. Even if you had a perfect training course to fix all that "you" see...

class subclass structure is just another way of doing Prestige classes. Not really innovation. Warlord base class was just a fighter subclass so borderline innovation. I think nothing since 3rd has truly had innovation. Most changes have just been change for change sake so we can print...