Search results

I have no real background on the involved, but the way they write on Twitter/Discord is cartoonish. Just going full “respect” monologue on everyone without including any semblance of it from their own end.

I have had a solid group to game with for years so I can’t imagine ever needing a “DM service” in that regard myself. But if someone wants to charge for their time and others are willing to pay to participate, so it goes.

Vecna’s bad alright, but is he cruel enough to interrupt a long rest outside his door?

Leaving possessive blanks is just begging for mad libbing.

Primarily point buy, offering the standard array for those that don’t care about doing or changing the math.

Depending on your appetite for or aversion to stream D&D: there is a Twitch DM I enjoy, BrettUltimus, that ran an all goblin campaign set in a primarily goblin region that takes a more light-hearted tone. It starts with the players coming together as a wandering circus and almost immediately...

With a good enough investigation check, you discover the IKEA assembly instructions buried under some ancient tomes.

See, I'm something of a One-and-a-Halfling.

No, I personally have other exclusions, though some may enter my setting at some point if I have an idea and find a purpose for them. Of the common options, I don't use Half-Elf/Half-Orc myself since I don't portray the same social structure and don't care have to consider the player question...

Part of my interest here was due to how I had already leaned toward Tasha's/MotM's less strictly defined design style and brought in other side content (Grung) to my brewed setting. I somewhat align various chargen options by setting/location in-universe, and I deviate totally from any official...

Very mean, but by the time the Baroness is 23.7 things should be smoothed over.

None I see that are particularly hard to find streaming. A lot of the earlier titles have been redistributed by Criterion or other boutique blu-ray companies.

We've been hexagonal at the very least.

I was aware of this, but I indulge the re-reappropriation anyway in part as an attempt at Rand erasure. Ah, a fellow Danielewski disliker?

I believe these can hold true. Without these following as the alternative. Engaging in thought exercises over the subjective nature of perception doesn’t necessitate the acceptance of all views due to that nature. Judgements can be born of ignorance or inexperience or, hell, even dishonesty...

This is understandable given the exaggeration of the example, but I don’t think that the underlying sentiment is necessarily accurate, at least for my view of it. I’ve just found after decades of forum discourse that being circular and abstracting out the philosophy of why and how we like...

Bah, scrolling back for information? Sounds like a job for the objectivists. It’s so much simpler over here with the subjectivists, where all I have to do is feel!

The rebut is that the measurable accuracy of digital clocks over analog is, for many (or few, or one—it doesn’t really matter) entirely separate from the concept of the value of watches as a product. Product features may have objective measurements, but those numbers only translate over to the...

It certainly seems like we could do that. It also seems like we could say that for a few people it’s low quality. The latter shouldn’t be so perturbing.