Search results

Apocalypse World is not trying to solve anything. It's a game where the players take on roles of people in a post-apocalyptic community that is under siege by from outside threats, internal strife and scarcity. We play to find out if the community can hold together or if the player characters...

In games like Apocalypse World the closest equivalent of the GM (Master of Ceremonies) is a player of the game. The chapter on how to facilitate the game is even called the playbook for the Master of Ceremonies. The way I see is that the referee role cuts against the scene framer role in a...

I don't think my play is transcendent. I'm not a skilled enough actor /roleplayer for that. But I do approach my play with creative intentions to delve into the personal, emotional lives of the characters I play and I try to bring that out when I run games. I don't think it's wild to say that...

There are plenty of people in these threads (@robertsconley @Lanefan @Micah Sweet) who have said game designers should not design games that change up the normative roles. That do not recognize the legitimacy of different play structures. Who continue to talk in terms of what game designers and...

The other thing explicit constraints in games do is help the whole group understand what is expected of them and also what you will not be getting from an experience. If I know that moments of personal stakes will be fairly rare and not be celebrated at the table I can choose to be invested in...

Constraints are a good thing. It's good that we have different games that have different constraints for players and GMs. Its level set a good thing that Daggerheart and D&D present different GM and player roles so we can have different sorts of experiences, and it becomes easier to select and...

I'll have more in the morning, but I do not endorse the idea that lore/setting is story or that all GMs are storytellers.

@thefutilist When it comes to engaging with a Narrativist agenda in mixed play I do miss transparent resolution somewhat but that's mostly my enjoyment of dice as palpable narrative tension (which is an aesthetic desire). What I find is the biggest stumbling block is usually other players...

So, for me, I like that when I'm the MC of Apocalypse World that I am not in charge of how things go. I like that I'm more of a facilitator and that I get to frame scenes and find out how things go with the other players. I like that I'm still playing a game with the other players, that I'm not...

What matters to me is where the agenda is (and how tightly we are holding on) - are we focusing on exploring the setting or is the setting serving the game as a vehicle for us to engage with the concerns of the characters?

Disregarding what it means to be player driven or not I would say that play where we are spending substantial amounts of time exploring and learning about the setting and engaged with conflicts that are external to the characters' concerns so that we can get to the points where our characters...

From a practical standpoint, I don't really start play not knowing much about the characters. Most of the trad games I play/run tend to fall more into elaborate backgrounds where you need a session just to create characters together. A lot of the Narrativist games I have run in the past do...

The prep you do in Apocalypse World (fronts/threats) is fairly light. As things get established over time defined parts of the setting become a bigger deal, but that's just part of the arc of most low to moderate myth play. You increasingly are dealing with a more locked down setting.

I would suggest that running roleplaying games in a conventional way comes with certain expectations and at least in the case of D&D, enumerated responsibilities - including acting as a referee, allowing mostly free exploration of the environment, adventure design, world building, etc. For most...

I think Clair Obscur is much more evidence that if you build the best game you can that you want to play than the audience will come.

I have tried V5. I still prefer Requiem Second Edition to it (Requiem 2e is still my favorite published version). Our home play group uses a variation of Requiem's rules with a substantially altered version of Masquerade's setting. @RenleyRenfield is the designer and the Storyteller for my...

So, when I play Vampire - The Requiem, Dune 2d20, Monsterhearts, Apocalypse World or Sorcerer because the scenarios and world building come out of who the characters are and breathe life to a particular location I get to just play a character who is going about their life in a world that is not...

For what it is worth, I think the only real crossover I have in game taste with @Thomas Shey is that we both like Pathfinder Second Edition more than 5e. I certainly like games that have strong GM authority more. I just like different sets of authority and responsibilities than are...

All roleplaying games are going to deal with some sort of conflict that play will focus on. I don't think world building and situation framing that focus on conflicts that are external to the player characters are inherently more organic than those that are more personal in nature. I don't think...

I don't really have a problem with them making a decision about the direction of the game. Only the idea of what a Powered by the Apocalypse game should be. The game they are designing is definitely not for me, but neither was Dungeon World really.