Search results

I liked it. It's nice to see Nathan Fillion in something. Maybe this won't be shown out of order.

I really hope that's a typo.

I wrote the Elemental Plane of Candy, but not the regular marshmallow golem. That was in the original Portable Hole Full of Beer. I just thought it worked well with my idea and came up with the improved version.

I'm not sure Peter even will get the scar. The only reason he encountered Claire and got her power was the warning from Future Hiro, who was probably from a timeline in which that never happened.

I also think this is how it works, though Hiro might not realize that they're in the future at this point.

It was worse than that. Fox aired the "Firefly" episodes in the order 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14, and 1. 11, 12, and 13 weren't on TV until SciFi ran the series in order. I like both versions of "The Dresden Files", although I still haven't read some of the books.

I don't think Sylar opened Jackie's head as much as was depicted in the painting. As I recall, he stopped as soon as he realized she wasn't his real target.

"You're in a dungeon, and not the kind with inexplicably placed monsters and enormous piles of treasure."

I think one character who should appear in a story like this, although he might not make a good member of the team, is Adrian Monk.

This is especially appropriate given Lee Majors' appearance on Jake 2.0 as an agent who hinted at the existance of previous enhancement programs. I agree that Lamont Cranston is a good choice.

I was about to suggest her. She could lead to David Xanatos serving as a financial backer. Harry Dresden would also be a good inclusion. It occurred to me that Toby from the movie Labyrinth could have been empowered by his exposure to all that magic at such a formative age. Some other...

"By tomorrow we'll all be swimming in hobgoblins. Not literally. I hope."

Bennet's first name is getting to be like the family's last name on "Malcolm in the Middle" or Springfield's location on "The Simpsons".

This has a dungeon as a creature, http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=148&.

My problem with this is that lichhood is completely voluntary so, if there are good liches, I see no proof of lichhood being evil. As far as I can tell, this god's antipathy towards all undead is just pointless bigotry and is thus evil.

Many things which aren't natural also aren't evil, although I agree with you about the ghasts. I have no problem with defending against actual threats, such as your village-munchers. Your example which I originally cited, however, involved a character specifically identified as good. In my...

If it was up to me, calling for the destruction of all undead would make the god evil.

I like the kaiju yrthak.

"Not all Englishmen have the same size feet." I like the book.

But Tristol says that illusions suck, and Shippo hardly has anything but illusions.