Search results

To add to what Wicht is saying... PF RPG also allows a certain type of game experience that is compatible with their setting. I swap around three different games. A Pathfinder 3.5 game, a Pathfinder RPG game, and a 4E game. At any time I am running two of those actively. My players like...

This is a really good point to reply to... I sincerely appreciate saying that you don't get it. Because it allows me to make a point that I think gets lost in all of this. (However, just to be clear- what you have in quotation marks above is your interpretation, not Paizo's.) What you're...

No lapse in judgment, however compounded upon another and another, justifies the first and subsquent ones to follow. You once personally took me to task for crapping in a thread. You were right to do so, and you still have my thanks for it. Having said that, now I'm saying that you can do...

Please disregard. I was replying to something as I was reading the posts in chronological order. Pirate Cat asked that the topic be dropped. Feel free to delete this post.

You're right Scribble. You didn't do any of that. I was seeing a trend in some of the other posts. No worries. We're cool.

Not me. :cool: I reported the event. I said I was disappointed, but I understood the legalities and the reasons behind doing it. And I maintain it's quite alright to feel that way. I won't apologize for it. I haven't sworn never to give WOTC my business again. I haven't called WOTC any...

I respect your right to feel differently. Particularly since the majority of posters concede that WOTC is in the right. Even those that are disappointed. However, you attack people for the way they think. That's not necessary. Loaded words like "ridiculous" and "crap" are just designed to get...

No contest sir. I was merely trying to draw the poster out in conversation. My players are disappointed, but I'm not prepared to argue on the site's behalf. Not from a legal point of view anyway. WOTC is within their rights. From a Public Relations perspective, I think this is unfortunate. I...

They were complete powercards based upon the PHB. It had a rather neat functionality: You could "build" a deck of power cards by selecting just the ones you needed. The site would then generate a document that would allow you to print out the power cards you had specifically selected. I am...

My apologies Morrus, I think I misspoke. Or rather.. I didn't think my words out carefully. I have seen *links* to 4E power cards that people have posted. The actual hosting happened elsewhere. The poster merely offered a link to the hosted site. That is a big distinction. On the other...

This is not an attack on you Zaukrie, I merely want to draw this out for the purposes of discussion and to understand where you're coming from. So, by extension of this position, you would agree that all Power Cards not made by WOTC (or made 100% entirely by the individual for their own sole...

I agree with Dave Chalker, it is interesting. Because there are a lot of Power Cards posted right here at EnWorld. So while I don't expect an offical comment from WOTC, I am curious about the reasoning. So that I can understand what their perceived boundries are, if nothing else. What makes a...

Power Cards - Dugeons & Dragons 4th Edition | D&D 4e Powercards I'll refrain from editorial comment in this first post. My apologies to the Moderators if this has been covered in another post that I have overlooked, or in another sub-board. I did do a quick skim before posting.

You have a point Dave, but there's also a potential backlash to doing a survey and then acting on nothing. I'd be hard pressed to imagine that most of the options listed (of items people would interested in seeing in DDI) didn't receive some sort favorable feedback when the survey is complete...

You're absolutely right. My apologies. Its the avalanche effect that gets me sometimes. It is also the side effect of coming out of the Edition Wars. Collectively there is a tendency to defend against critique without necessarily pointing out the positive. All the preceeding posters were...

Okay okay okay...! :eek: Thanks Rodney. Thank you Catsclaw, SirBrennan, Shroomy, and future posters. I was wrong. I'm plenty glad to be wrong. But folks (I say to the general community), it was okay for me to question it. It was okay to be concerned. I clearly didn't condemn the article...

After a brief skim.. I liked this article. Let me say that upfront. However there has been some concern aboout the amount of preview and playtest material versus original content in the magazines lately. This is not a "preview" or "playtest" article, but yet it is.. somewhat disguised with...

I agree. You don't ask people what they want from a pre-determined list that you provide, if you don't have a serious interest in trying to develop and sell those products. Otherwise, all you do is draw their attention to something they might want and will be disappointed that they can't get...

I'm not going to pick on you Anthony, since you said you weren't being snarky. I think addressing consumer trust is important though. Especially since investment in the game is tied to future sales.

Interesting. Ari M. (Mouseferatu) posted here on EnWorld that he had seen the Scales of War story bible, confirming that the document does in fact exist. He as the author of one of the chapters. He couldn't comment on the contents, of course, as a freelancer. However I have no reason not to...