Search results

That'd be good. But WotC seems to have a fit at the idea of producing adventures. "They don't sell!!! Don't SELL I'LL TELL YA!!11"

Agreed. It does sound cool. Tell us more! :)

Before houseruling the heck out of it, I'd advice to first play the rules included in the Pathfinder book. They might not play like they look on the paper.

It's up there with Ptolus, most definitely. :)

I like the mechanic personally. Points/rounds, Rounds/day, both are fine by me, actually. :)

It is a good idea. Ta.

I'm all for Golarion, but I don't really want the 2e-style mountain of background that comes with its Chronicles supplements. I'm basically thinking of running some modules, maybe an AP here and there, while treating the campaign setting book as a stand-alone sandbox product for me to do as I...

This is awesome. Thanks!

LOL! Brilliant. That made me laugh.

Me too. It doesn't seem like the other options were particularly relevant to the topic, unfortunately.

This for me too. I have all the "Complete..." crunchy stuff one would want. I don't need that kind of stuff. Adventures, however? Totally there. A supplement specific to high level campaigns and adventures, with complete breakdown of game components affecting game play and how to handle them...

I am still running 3.5, and I know many people in my area who are doing the same, or running Pathfinder.

*nod* Basically.

It is playable, and enjoyable. Do yourself a favor: grab them, and enjoy. :)

Aside from the core books PHBs/MMs/DMGs, and aside from setting-specific material, how would you rate the 4E sourcebooks published to date? i.e. basically products presented on this page. You might rate them from the one you prefer to the one you dislike the most, for instance. For instance...

WW basically gave Monte Cook the right to do whatever he wanted with the WoD IPs, and he built a completely different universe using them. It is *not* the old or new WoD with the Storyteller system. It's a post-apocalyptic world with different types of supernatural creatures creeping into our...

When you can't talk plain English but instead some sort of game-speech where every mundane word is redefined in ways that have bearings on the rules of the game themselves, it's become WAY too abstract for my tastes. That's a problem with RPGs (whether that's just recent RPGs or not is up for...

I use Swords & Wizardry at the game table and refer to the original 1974 rules and supplements for some houserules and pretty much all additional materials the game uses. I see my campaign very much as an OD&D campaign, so I don't really separate the clone from the original either. S&W, S&S...

I think Pathfinder is going to be a great game, just like 3.X was/is a great game. I scratch my itches with OD&D, AD&D and Pathfinder, depending on the exact nature of the itch at a particular moment. Not been in a 4E game yet, but I would try it.

I don't know about "MMOs" and the like, but there's nothing wrong with WFRPG2. Why these guys would want to change it this drastically just blows my mind. *shrug*