Search results

IE: remember bag-of-rats

Hes just THAT good.

Which is why the effect line is put in. Fact of the matter is that (TMK) the above is never presented in the book and there is no other template for subsequent independent attacks. So either "two attacks" is the determining factor, or there are no subsequent independent attacks in 4th edition.

When you grant healing with one of your cleric powers that has the healing keyword... PHB page 61

You just answered yourself.

Increase to +4 bonus and 2d6 + Constitution modifier damage at 11th level, and to +6 bonus and 3d6 + Constitution modifier damage at 21st level. PHB page 34

It is a style change that WOTC has gone through but is now standard (pretty much ever since PHB 2). Instead of listing the conditions of a power as well as noting that similar conditions dont apply it just states the conditions that apply.

First let me note that the only issue I see is the transfer enchantment situation, the others are just good DMing. However the PCs shouldnt be penalized if this situation is played out: AV page 199 Something so relatively minor as the situations above shouldnt warrant a massive penalty simply...

He can have all of the badwrongfun he wants, but he shouldnt recommend something that is contrary to the rules without noting as such.

Why, so that PCs are completely unbalanced in relation to each-other and the monsters they will be fighting? Fact of the matter is that masterwork armor is a key part of the 4th edition math, and if you take it out you are overly hampering your PCs. It is already difficult trying to keep up...

Well the DMG does say, "As Dungeon Master, you wear several hats: storyteller, rules arbiter, actor..." Fact of the matter is that the DMs job is clearly spelled out in the DMG, and being a referee is clearly pointed out as being one such aspect of that job. If the player likes to quote rules...

Never mind.

At what point does a bow stop being a bow? If I cut the bowstring, can I then hit a guy with this stick that used to work as a bow? I think that at some point all of this gets a bit silly and we just have to use our common sense.

The attack gets no proficiency bonus and does only 1d4 damage. I think is bad enough of an option already that you dont have to completely break it down so that it is totally useless.

In case anyone cares, a longbow would be a one handed imrovised melee weapon as per the weight rules and do 1d4 damage with no proficiency bonus.

I would do component cost plus 10% of the market price plus 10% of the focus cost if not supplied by the party.

Works for me: http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/8444/forumsareup.png

Do note that an improvised thrown weapon must weigh 1lb. Anything larger or smaller then that must be left up to the DM. This time it was a sword, next time it might be a rock, but I doubt that anyone thinks that throwing a sword is the same a throwing a rock or even a 12lb Maul.

These are the only caltrops I have seen: C C Caltrops (minor; encounter) ✦ Trap As a minor action, a kobold spiker can drop caltrops in an adjacent square. Any size Medium or larger creature that enters a square with caltrops suffers a +10 attack against Reflex that does 2d4 + 4 damage and...

PHB page 278