Search results

ah, good. I figured as much. Just had to be sure.

I don't think I made this clear. (edit; ninjaed by Lauberfen...) Power 1: Hit: 1d6 and blinded. Miss: half damage, not blinded. Power 2: Hit: 1d6 and immobilized. Miss: half damage. Does the absence of immobilized in the second power's miss line mean that the target is still immobilized...

I couldn't find a thread with this specifically, so I'm gonna ask this now.. Some dailies have miss effects, but I find the inconsistencies in the Miss line confusing. Lets say we have two powers, both doing Damage+effect. But then the miss line comes in; power 1: Miss: Half damage, no...

Actually, Clerics and Paladins are required to be an alignment that is compatible to their chosen Deity. (you can't be an evil servitor to a good god, but you can be unaligned...) And Avengers must be the exact same alignment as their deity.

I'd argue that they don't apply. Dragon's Wrath and Clinging Breath both say; "This power uses the same ability as your dragon breath racial power, and it uses the same damage type you initially chose for that power." I'd take this to mean that they look to your choices made for Dragon...

I would argue that it is implied in the way the sentence is structured that the penalty applies to saving versus the conditions listed. Not other conditions also imposed by the spell. So the penalty would apply to the Slowed condition from Sleep, increasing chance of failure. Then the...

By RAW, I think it's legal. It's a free action to apply the penalty to "designate one creature you have cast a wizard spell upon that has an effect that lasts until the subject succeeds on a saving throw." And free actions can be taken at any point (note. GM's discretion...)

No Swordmage? Or Drow or Genasi? I take this to mean that you haven't got the Forgotten Realms Player's Guide then...

Post it note on the offending pages? edit: with a description of the errata on the note (duh...)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the combat challenge limited to once per round? It being an immediate interrupt and all...

I agree. To an extent. But clearly the condition of free stuff in this case is option a or b. Neither of which are bad options. In fact, these are options that most people should be taking anyway. (because the math is wonky)

I don't know about you, but if my DM offers me free stuff I say yes, please. Thank you sir. May I have another? (not entirely true. I would question my DM's motives. he's eeevil...) This isn't about taking away your choices. This is an offer of something you wouldn't have had a choice for in...

I don't know if this has been caught yet. I haven't found it anywhere else tho: Page 73, PHB, Angelic Avenger Paragon Path lvl 20 daily power has no targets. -Majushi

Is this some form of terrible baiting? If you really want the answer tho; 1) All players and creatures roll initiative. 2) People act in descending order of rolled init. 3) a turn consists of a standard, move and minor action. (Standard can be converted into move actions. Move actions can be...

And now, for something completely different; (well. not that different...) Can I use a shuriken as a melee weapon? (i.e. like a javelin or a dagger)

Another point I just thought of; Immediate actions can't be taken in your own turn right? So if you provoke an Opp Attack, you can't use Shield or Staff of D. to protect yourself?

Wasn't that exact build suggested in a recent Dragon article?

Now, this doesn't specify that you cannot retrain a power gained from a class feature. But what it does do is limit you to retraining the power from the same class... At least by RAW. So a Half-Elf that took a Rogue at-will for dilletante would still have to have a Rogue at-will...

While I support the free exchange of information in this case, so the Wizard isn't gimped, I also agree with Stalker0. Unless the dailies are awesome, Shield just cannot be beat.

Well, yeah. That sentence has two things wrong with it; 1) it specifies that the sword is in the main hand. 2) it doesn't mention the offhand property. That aside. Your statement is also false (in part). The character in question could wield a shuriken and a short sword, as the short...