Search results

As much as I don't mean to derail things here. But, before we vote on location, now is probably a good idea for the "level of restriction" vote. If this is still true from the Juxta prevote, anyway. Either have the Greyhawk vote (since it's being discussed anyway) and let FR default. Or FR...

(Wrong thread. Continue! Delete me!)

Nothing about the chat really. Don't care. "It's happening and that's that" was enough more me. Do what must be done! Can we have attachments turned on so we don't have to buy our own image hosting or worry about the bandwidth being used up for the free stuff?

The Dalelands: It really defeats the purpose of having selected the Realms if we just drop in our own generic village/whatever. It is an option, but maybe suggest an established locale? Otherwise we could have just voted homebrew and made the Plane of McPlaindia. Westgate: Westgate is a...

Well, I suppose it all depends on what "everyone" really wants. And how much people want to acknowledge the setting. So, a generic location selected/created by the staff to suit the desire for players to do whatever they wish and be able to play whatever they want would be reasonable option...

If we voted on the things you consider to be "vague" after the vote was made on how restrictive the setting was going to be, then yes, you may not be able to play with half your characters as they are. Really, if you're considering the "restictive" option, you should be voting on it for its...

Those things are optional. Which means we (as in us) were/are going to vote on/clarify those topics anyway. The skeleton proposal, from what I understand, is going to make up the backbone of the "restricted" setting. The other/optional list is what the mini-votes will be for. On the subject...

I don't think the proposed changes for the tavern (on the restricted setting option) can be defined anymore clearly. They are all fairly self-explanatory. If there are any additional things were to be added, I'm sure it would be before we voted and no during or after. Do you mean to what...

This isn't the correct forum for Magic: The Gathering Q&A. You want to go here http://boards.wizards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=131, for future questions. To answer your question though, yes he can. Last in, first out. Good luck!

This isn't the place for discussing the new chat, the ISRP moderation team has nothing to do with the change, so there isn't any point in presenting discontent to them. The new chat software is happening, period. Anyway.. There is a reason there will be two rooms, hopefully one of the two...

*quickly scrambles away from his thin ice and flees!*

If by "black listing" you mean, making sure the vote is fair, then yes. That's an overstatement by far, it would have been correct if we say..asked for the Realms to be removed from the list. Or told everyone not to vote for it, which no one has done. Oh, and calling people's statements...

They're being "allowed to stand" at this point because she can't make those alterations once the poll is up. Duplicates will not count, just like you want, Tharv. I have the highest confidence in Adele's ability to count, so there isn't anything to worry about. As far as fair and impartial...

I'm pretty sure Adele (since she's an admin) and possibly moderators too can see IPs on the people who voted. Should be able to elminate that way.

A left! A right! Hey, FR is using brass knucks! The ref makes the titan setting discard them...and Planescape is back in the fight!

'Lo! Did Planescape claw itself from its earthen grave of abandoned settings to do battle with the Realms! One. Last. Time.

I sure got "told", yep. Wait, wait.. Nope. Anyway. There are times during the day when the boards enter a proverbial death throe of lag, this tends to happen fairly regularly. Today, I tried to login to the new chat during this time and was, of course, unable to do so. My questions are...

I can only assume, since everyone likes to make broad, generalized statements these days instead of speaking to someone directly, that the "you're arguing too much, so I'll make a post about it to drag things further off topic" statements include myself and a few other posters. So... I'm sorry...

Oh, you mean the entire purpose of a forum? I do believe we are on the same page, yes. Wait... What the deuce? I am very sorry if intellectual debate offends you. However, with the exception of the odd post or two that has tried to direct people away from this thread, everyone has been...

Well, since you're done, I'll just make a final rebuttal. From what I gather, you seem to have this absolutist view that the new chat will keep people from leaving and that iChat is the main reason people flee in "droves" from ISRP. Yes, threads were made about the chats being down, some were...