Search results

Strange question... Why do all of you who seem to hate any build that is multiclass and synergistic? And then allow them? Why not just outright ban multiclassing so everyone can be 'pure build x'? And no hate for stupidly unpowerful options either? If enough people pick bad builds, the person...

Be wary that if all they have is at-wills, that leaves 3 or 4 attack choices for each player, one being a basic attack and usually the other at-wills are general use and situational. So it could eaisly become a "I use power B again whilst still hoping that I don't die from lack of healing" slog.

Ah, well, then Shamen's positioning of their pet got a bit eaiser with the rule that enemies are creatures. You can only Attack of oppertunity enemies. Enemies are a type of creature, which a shamen pet is not. Therefore you can't AOO them and then can float around with impunity.

Monks are implement users. The damage dice of their implements is largly irrelevent. They just happen to be able to use any weapon they are proficent in as an implement.

Is it at all possible to find the refrence to that top concept for me?

What with to get that kind of damage at 15?

Quick quesiton! What exactly are the requirements for a target to be considerd an enemy? Could a cleric go around Astral Sealing random objects? Or does it have to be something threatening, in which case can the same cleric go around astral sealing traps? Could a shielding swordmage mark a...

Sufficiently advanced technology is martial magic, by the way.

Where are you getting shield prof in the first place? Also, no leather armor? What is your ac in cloth there? Vaguly defendery or is that not the point? Umm.. how much palidan stuff do you actually have in that build?

Especally with that one feat that makes divine characters give a +5 to death saves to allies as a passive effect.

Why would they play a fighter in plate instead of a fighter/palidin with the hybrid talent to get plate then? It's because each hybrid class is slightly less then half a class most of the time. And some combos can't really survive without the feat. Almost any class with light armor is bad off...

Normal feats, not so much. Class features that cost a specific feat you can take once is different. I guess they could call it a post-requisit, if you prefer?

Yep! Cause the most boreing and least flavorful race actually already got the boot! Give you a hint, one of those races is not like the otheres, one of those races exists...

This. Also, if humans get outed this round, I'm voting hobbits off the island next? Deal?

Rhythm blade parrying dagger FTW!

Or, alternatly, since monks are not arcane and don't benefit from dual implement spellcaster, just wield the offhand defensive weapon as a weapon. No staff mastery but you can use a parrying dagger that way. You need a weapon in the other hand to offhand a weapon. The primary had will still...

Radiant is a +enhancement bonus damage again when doing radiant damage, which it can convert your attack into at will, it's kinda useful.

Expertise at epic tiers, and the +4 to a given defense feats. Some people think that there are better options still. >.>

Displacer. Once a day, the enemies have to roll twice and take lowest for the encounter.

It's firefox. Rather handy feature, huh?