Search results

I would wish you luck, but I kind of hope you don't succeed. For my answer, at the minimum 1 befroe this poll.

I really di not know anything about C&C, I included it in my example becasue I know a lot of people use it.

I effectively give all of my archers such a quiver because counting arrows is not fun. One that produced special arrows wouuld be cool though, as I do count them. Teh above ideas are good, and unfortunately I cannot add to them

To me it isanothro ne ofthe feats/class abilities/etc that allows one player to dictate the terms of the game to the rest of the party, and that is jsut not cool unless the rest of the party knows about it and accepts it. And when I say knows aobut it, knows the rules and ins and outs well...

I just got a couple of free PDFs due to answer ing antoehr poll on Enworld yesterday. I appreciate the gift, and will be sure to give the pdfs the attention they deserve. But I am 99% sure they will never make it into my games. Even if they are amazing and have great ideas. I just don't play...

Ancestral Knowledge Races of stone page 136 Dwarf only. Can make untrianed knowledge skills and use wisdom bonus.

Well I agree with Power attack but I don't think the others are really no-brainers. Natural Spell is an excelelnt example of a no-brainer, where if you don't take it people might wonder if you know how to make a character well. I don't like feats like that. Point Blank shot is not a no brainer...

I have always rather liked the bard. A huge variety of spells, and good surviveability and skills.

That would have been my second choice. What a dip class, the only real one in the PHB. If I want a good horse to ride, I will take an easily replaceable Druid one, thanks. Beastmaster is good fo rthat also. Man, they can have wicked horses.

Yep, it is a no brainer for a 6th elvel feat in a scout build,. Ad this to the multiclass feat where a ranger/scout levels stack for both favored enemy and skirmish, and I can see a very very scary skirmish archer coming up, espeically adding in +4 or +6 for favored enemy. Plus isn't there a...

1. Am I overlooking something? Is there something that makes this not as overpowering as I think? Well, start with the required feats. Spell-focus abjuration is one of the weakest feats I have ever seen, and greater is worse. 2. Would you allow a player to play this class in your campaign...

Mysteries, Monsters and Mayhem about fits my bill. Though the players are mostly responsible for the last one :)

Seventh Spellcasters have a good selection of spells both in and out of combat, fighters have their second atttak, and everyone can get a small piece of most prestige classes. Lots of good stuff without too much power.

Three votes in. A fair sample. Monk wins with two votes. Bard gets one, a good runner up. Man I love being on the winning side.

I went with dwarves because they are the most human like of the races in terms of attitude and interactions. Halflings are human lite, and really jsut seem too much like adolescent humans to me. Elves are... welll this is a family forum, so I guess I will self edit .... not fun. Gnomes are a...

Nothing there to understnad, don't feel bad.

Of course not. You can take it with as many different characters as you like. Waht?

I'd watch placing too many abilities on an already super-useful stat like this. From a game balance perspective.

This is one point I always see brought up. But how much time does it take to scribe all those scrolls? Ignore the money and xp, though for any spell where you want them to be equal in power to your memorized ones, the hit is heavy, especially in mid-high level games. Sure a scroll of mage armor...

Please, not another one of these threads. For some reason they are popping up on all the boards i visit these last few days. For me both are good, and can be very powerful, but as they play totally differently, it is ahrd to compare them. If you like prep and micro-management, go for a wizard...