Search results

Could you answer why you would change up classes to fit this concept when there is a class does all you want with out alteration? As an aside remember do not be constrained by what class or classes this concept would have been in past editions.

the CS response The CS has been giving a response that confuses even me but it has been consistent in the last 2 months. Which is the two attacks line is in error and should be deleted. which makes the rain of blows go from a no brainer to crap for any one but the guy with the right weapon types.

Bob, Your post came off as very very dismissive of thier points, one of which by the way comes directly from the MM, which you have stated that you cared about as it is official to you. This i think is the reason he responded as he did. Hope you both can see where this is going on stop it...

Well at least we can agree to disagree. As to the design in regards to whether having the AV or not will matter for peoples' games. Wotc has stated that they intend to use all of their books in this fashion. Also this has always been the case where one book would make an option or another quite...

qft

My point was not to compare DWT to Weapon Focus as you have done but to put it next to Action surge and other racial feats to see where the feat truly is. Further more when have a feat that gives +2/+3/+4 as you have suggested then that does put them directly ahead at the cost of one there 18...

oh is that it. For real? that is just silly in system that allows retraining the above is such a baseless position. I mean who has ever seen the fighter who never takes a superior weapon feat run around with fully powered up magic versions of every weapon they have the skill to use? Not even in...

The detractors of DWT so as i have seen still refuse to accept that the racial feats in 4E are JUST better than the general ones. Not one person on this thread who is lined up against DWT has referred to and/or compared it to any of the other racial feats in the PHB. Every human i know has taken...

This feat is not much better than Weapon Focus and not better for a dwarven fighter at all.......now when you compare this to Action Surge it is trash Comparing DWT to Weapon focus is just wrong based off of all the really powerful Racial feats in this game. Please do not compare it to racial...

why does anyone have an issue with a feat that makes Dwarves better with the traditional dwarven weapons? I mean come on it is a racial feat and so far they have all been much much better than general feats anyway

Benly did you read the OP? "why I would recommend swapping Ranged Basic Attack if you can afford to." Please explain how this is " In this case, I'm pretty sure the point of saying "it works RAW" is "there is a problem with the rules as written that needs fixing". It is QUITE clear that this...