Search results

It's really not. "This guy broke a contract that he signed" is not the same as "This guy did a thing that would have been bad if he signed that contract over there".

Cena literally signed, was subject to, and broke a no-resale clause. He had an agreement. Apples and oranges.

They certainly could have gone for that. As I understand it, it's fairly questionable whether that'd be a justified use of copyright striking, but that would at least have been a relatively normal action.

This has happened with video games many many many times, and all the stories, legal actions, description of possible courses to be taken, and so on that come out of that I could find are all about producer vs. retailer. The final purchaser is not bound by street date agreements. He didn't sign...

The normal courses of action for a producer to take against a retailer breaking street dates are, so far as I've been able to find, not sending stuff to that retailer in advance anymore, demanding restitution from the retailer, and suing the retailer. For the producer to jump down to deal with...

If you prefer: "Acquired under duress"

I'm confused here by why people are speaking as if Wizards had any legal claim to the cards AT ALL. 1. Wizards sells the cards to dealers, distributors, etc. There's an agreement with those people that street dates will not be broken, but the cards have been sold to said dealers, etc. They are...