Search results

I'll definitely play an Eldarin wearing Rouge, Russian Red lipstick and also red eye-shadow. Not much classy though... propably will look like a whore.

This.

True. Those would be the minstrels or troubadours. This class looks interesting. But that hurting foes with sonic damage from the instrument... Maybe it's too over the top. All I imagine is some rock-star shooting laser beams with his electric guitar (I'm sure I saw that somewhere). What about...

Huh?!? Is this really how it works? Btw what are the DCs for Easy/Medium/Hard checks? Same as in 3.5?

I don't watch videos with people speaking about ... stuff. Reading is much better and you get all the words. Especially since I'm at work So yeah... I didn't watch the video :) The website has a lot of content and the new layout design is nice, but the usability really sucks. It's so hard to...

The books look quite thick. Bigger than the 3.5 ones.

First, let me say I'm a 4E lover. But this class is the one thing I never liked in the new edition, ever since the first previews, and these are my main reasons: - the name (IMHO it sucks but it was already discussed to death ;) ) - the military officer concept (maybe it's just my dislike for...

As I see it you're describing two settings: - the first one is "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", vampires pop out like mushrooms; - the second is more like Bram Stoker's Dracula. Why can't I use the one that fits me and my campaign better? Maybe these details should be left for campaign settings to...

Buying an extra copy of the PHB? Why would I want to do that? We'll also have all the info in DDI, as they've said. And there's always piracy and a lap-top LOL :lol:

Yeah, they are mostly cosmetic. But I don't have any problem with that. Probably the differences are similar to the Divine/Arcane differences in 3E. Divine spellcasters use Wisdom, Arcane ones use Intelligence or Charisma. Everything else was pretty much fluff. Then there could also be the...

Ufffff that is so true! Didn't know that feeling I felt had a scientific name :) The same with Beowulf goes with those plastic-looking fashion models and heavy botoxed people

A lot has been said on this thread, and I agree with almost everything, and I'm even amazed that everyone kept really polite and nice with each other. The honest tone and the good writing skills of the OP must have helped :) CleverNickName, I just want to ask you if you talked with the players...

Thank you so much for this thread!!! :D Exactly the advice I was looking for.

Exactly. You can choose whatever class you want and call your character a Witch. Problably Warlock is the most adequate, but as has been said, Wizards, Clerics or Druids would also do (whatever your concept of a witch is). Do you think that maybe WotC created the 4E Warlock class to fill the...

fourth edition feel in seventeen syllables is very diffic

Dungeons & Dragons, Haikus in fourth edition... That's so anime!!!!!!!

Congratulations! That's a great idea and I really like the old-school look of that sheet! I love that you just fill in the basics and everything else you write in a blank box. Very versatile! I feel that not knowing all the rules was a good thing to what you did. Instead of squeezing every...

Anyway, now it's quite difficult to read that page and find all the info you want. And most is mixed with early rumours... Obviously Morrus did a wonderful job, keeping us all informed of all info available. Thank you Morrus! :D But now we have PHB_Lite from Verys Arkon, "Monsters & More" from...

The Druid version of the None role would be the Tree-Hugger-Passive-Pacifist. Or a Jain.

That is interesting. Psychologically and Anthropologically.