Search results

I cant get it to work. It says I have to update my profile then when I enter my info and press save changes nothing happens. Can someone tell me WTF is up?

Not really dm should be free to change anything in a campaign book for any reason he wants. Keeping all fluff in the campaign guide the same limits dm creativity. I hate settings that have too much fluff because it limits what the dm and players can do with it. Give me a few basics and some...

I dont see how people adventured in 3.5 FR. There were way too many npcs to make it worth it. Every last detail of the world was known. There was literally nothing for the dm or group to do at all. At least thats the way I felt about it. The 3.5 campaign guide spelled everything out there...

I miss nothing. I hated random treasure charts as 90% of the time the item is useless for the group. "Oh gee another longsword too bad no one uses those." Nothing irks me more than getting a powerful and cool magic item that no one in the party can use. Random monster tables were just a way...

I really like this idea. A mostly dead plane with points of light in it. I cannot wait for Darksun its so different than the usual dnd setting.

You seem to be ignoring the fact that most adventurers would not recieve such an heirloom as those were the providence of nobles. A lot of player characters come from more comon/humble backgrounds. You can have a very good character with a coherent back story without getting some special item...

I liked prism pentadad and tribe of one a lot. In fact Id say the writing in both series is better than that of R.A. Salvatores dritz books.

I tried a 3.5 game, but after 4e it just didnt feel right. The class imbalance was even more glaringly obvious and the lack of real abilities at low level killed any fun for me. The racial stat penalties also offended me a lot more. I just feel like 4e is a better game over all and will never...

4th edition. Mechanical reason balanced classes. I can finally play a fighter and not be useless half the game. Also no racial negatives means even a half orc wizard is a viable character, not the most optimal but is still viable. Story reason. Lack of alignment rules means you can have...

The way its organized though each individual player will not need too many books. If playing in ebaron you will need the ebaron players guide, or if you want to use things from it. If playing an arcane character phb with your class, arcane power are all you need same for martial and others...

I disagree with this post 4e is the funnest version of dnd yet with the best out of combat mechanics of any eddition, actual rules for gaining xp from skill usage. It is far from a minature game. If your not rping then that is your problem not the systems. Personally I will not play another...

Actually I dont understand it new eddition=change, if they had sold me the same tired worn out sacred cows as a new eddition I would not have bought it. I personally feel that 4e brought a breadth of fresh air to the game. As long as the game is fun to play, and gets a group of people together...

campaign settings and adventure paths, I personally think that wotc can do anything else better than 3rd parties.

Flavour should be in books like the draconomicon, and campaign guides, not the core books. Personally I was really happy with the mm as it allows the dm to fit those creatures in where he wants to. And just the little info we have gives me a lot of ideas on how to use gratz if I was going to...

Personally I hated the 3e cosmonology with a passion, a different plane for absolutley everything, way over detailed when it came to monsters and villians, I actually like the fluff light nature of it as it allows dms to be a lot more creative.

That would work, or one with armour plates of heavy wood, or metal that would slow it down, but make it harder to hit and more resilient. Though I do like your idea of feats for people who make use of the airships better than others. But with a simple design like this I think it would be...

Awsome, I love it. If people do not have rules for seperate locations, it means vechicles do not need rules for different hit locations, but the AC does seem absudrly low, though that might just be the base model, I can easily see armoured ones flying around with far higher, or more manuvarable...

I just hope WOTC is still able to maintain control of their product, as anside if I want to play dnd I want to play dnd, not a clone or rip off, if I want to play a different rpg I do not want that rpg to be using dnd mechanics. Also I really do not want companies to be able to mooch off of...

Am I the only one who wants a stricter OGL? Mainly because what pazio is doing has me ticked off. I mean they are using what WOTC did, doing minimal work of their own and publishing it as their product. Frankly any OGL that limited that would be welcome. Towards the end of 3e their were way...

I hereby unofficially dub you the winner of this thread.